Screening strategies for obtaining novel, biologically active, fungal secondary metabolites from marine habitats

By B. Schulz, S. Draeger, T. D. Cruz, J. Rheinheimer, K. Siems, S. Loesgen, J. Bitzer, Oliver Schloerke, A. Zeeck, Ines Kock and 3 more. 2008

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cell Biology, Pharmacology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dd1c2cb6746b2889c030b336a078c153cf233ae9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cell Biology

1. T. Suryanarayanan
2. E. Jones
3. Thokur Sreepathy Murali
4. N. Thirunavukkarasu

In Pharmacology

1. N. Thirunavukkarasu
2. E. Jones
3. T. Suryanarayanan

Citations in the corpus

• Fifty years of marine mycology (2011, background): “…shown to be an excellent source of new compounds (Schulz et al. 2002; Jones 2008; Pan et al. 2008; Chaeprasert et al. 2010; Rateb et al. 2010) with Schulz et al. (2008) demonstrating that endophytic fungi were a better source of novel secondary metabolies than fungi associated with marine algae.”
• Fungal endophytes and bioprospecting (2009, background): “In addition to plants of the tropical rain forests, those growing in harsh habitats such as hot and cold deserts, saline and acidic soils and marine habitats have to be screened for bioactive metabolite-producing endophytes (Schulz et al. 2008).”