Head Movement in Linguistic Theory
By Ora Matushansky. Linguistic Inquiry, 2006
587 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Philosophy
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dd11b9cbe94bea7d18245821d0f43f788ba0ad5e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Language and Linguistics
- Ruth Kramer
- De Vries
- C. Donati
- Mark C. Baker
- Niina Ning Zhang
- Carlo Cecchetto
- Sam Epstein
- Miki Obata
In Philosophy
- Ruth Kramer
- Mark C. Baker
- Niina Ning Zhang
- De Vries
- Carlo Cecchetto
- C. Donati
- Sam Epstein
- Miki Obata
Citations in the corpus
- On Labeling: Principle C and Head Movement (2010, background): “See also Seely 2006 for a different attempt to eliminate labels.”
- Pseudo Noun Incorporation as Covert Noun Incorporation: Linearization and Crosslinguistic Variation (2014, background): “Koopman & Szabolcsi (2000), for example, take a strong stand that head movement should be rejected in favor of remnant phrase movement, and Matushansky (2006) partially reduces head movement to movement to specifier positions.”
- On Multidominance and Linearization (2009, background): “That is, without further assumptions, the second occurrence 13 Others have argued that head movement does not involve a derived adjunction structure; see, for instance, Koeneman (2000) and Matushansky (2006) for discussion and alternative solutions.”
- On the Attributive Nature of Superlatives (2008, methodology): “These forms differ by a suffix (on the morphophonology of Russian long-form adjectives, see Halle & Matushansky 2006).”
- Clitic doubling or object agreement: the view from Amharic (2014, methodology): “Matushansky (2006) argues that m-merger can also occur without head movement.”
- Feature-Splitting Internal Merge: Improper Movement, Intervention, and the A/A¢ Distinction (2011, background): “Also see Toyoshima 2000 and Matushansky 2006 for related ideas.”
- Root merger in Chinese compounds (2007, background): “1 In this paper, we do not consider resultative and causative V-V compounds, since we have not excluded the possibility that they are derived by head movement (see Matushansky 2006 for syntactic head movement).”