Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab in Moderately-to-Severely Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

By J. Merrill, C. Neuwelt, D. Wallace, J. Shanahan, K. Latinis, J. Oates, T. Utset, C. Gordon, D. Isenberg, H. Hsieh and 2 more. Arthritis & Rheumatism, 2010

1,302 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Objective B cells are likely to contribute to the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and rituximab induces depletion of B cells. The Exploratory Phase II/III SLE Evaluation of Rituximab (EXPLORER) trial tested the efficacy and safety of rituximab versus placebo in patients with moderately-to-severely active extrarenal SLE. Methods Patients entered with ≥1 British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A score or ≥2 BILAG B scores despite background immunosuppressant therapy, which was continued during the trial. Prednisone was added and subsequently tapered. Patients were randomized at a ratio of 2:1 to receive rituximab (1,000 mg) or placebo on days 1, 15, 168, and 182. Results In the intent-to-treat analysis of 257 patients, background treatment was evenly distributed among azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, and methotrexate. Fifty-three percent of the patients had ≥1 BILAG A score at entry, and 57% of the patients were categorized as being steroid dependent. No differences were observed between placebo and rituximab in the primary and secondary efficacy end points, including the BILAG-defined response, in terms of both area under the curve and landmark analyses. A beneficial effect of rituximab on the primary end point was observed in the African American and Hispanic subgroups. Safety and tolerability were similar in patients receiving placebo and those receiving rituximab. Conclusion The EXPLORER trial enrolled patients with moderately-to-severely active SLE and used aggressive background treatment and sensitive cutoffs for nonresponse. No differences were noted between placebo and rituximab in the primary and secondary end points. Further evaluation of patient subsets, biomarkers, and exploratory outcome models may improve the design of future SLE clinical trials.

Subfields: Hepatology, Immunology, Rheumatology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dcfbff2de91e190604c9fe4db2c357c15b96becc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Immunology

  1. Jacques Banchereau
  2. V. Pascual
  3. Yong‐jun Liu
  4. K. Palucka
  5. Rafi Ahmed
  6. Bali Pulendran
  7. Shizuo Akira
  8. R. Steinman

Citations in the corpus