Scaling Relations in Experimental Ecology

By R. Gardner. 2001

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dcf648fa5819125e4a65c56cd37ca26c9fb8e185

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Andrew Storfer
2. Stephen F. Spear
3. Wesley M. Hochachka
4. L. Airoldi
5. L. Waits
6. M. Murphy

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Daniel Fink
2. G. Ballard
3. Andrew Storfer
4. Giles Hooker
5. R. Caruana
6. Steve Kelling
7. Stephen F. Spear
8. Jeffrey Scott Evans

Citations in the corpus

• Putting the ‘landscape’ in landscape genetics (2007, background): “Genetic variation may respond differently over varying spatial or temporal scales, which is a critical issue in defining research questions and subsequent study design in landscape ecology and spatial statistics (for review, see Gardner, 2001).”
• THE EFFECTS OF SEDIMENTATION ON ROCKY COAST ASSEMBLAGES (2003, background): “Extrapolating results from small to larger scales is still a major problem and challenge in ecology (Gardner et al. 2001).”
• Data-Intensive Science: A New Paradigm for Biodiversity Studies (2009, background): “…because of the logistical or ethical challenges of implementing large-scale, hypothesis-driven experiments (Hargrove and Pickering 1992); even those large-scale experiments that do exist (Gardner et al. 2001) are conducted at a relatively small scale in relation to the ranges of most species.”