The impact of audit committee quality on financial reporting quality and audit fees

By E. Rainsbury, M. Bradbury, S. Cahan. 2009

127 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dce41e3f4e5fa16696d5b20f1cd84133983163f8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. D. Sharma
2. Chaudhry Ghafran
3. Umapathy Ananthanarayanan
4. N. O’Sullivan
5. Vineeta D. Sharma
6. W. Robert Knechel

In Strategy and Management

1. Chaudhry Ghafran
2. Umapathy Ananthanarayanan
3. N. O’Sullivan
4. Vineeta D. Sharma
5. D. Sharma

Citations in the corpus

• Client Importance and Earnings Management: The Moderating Role of Audit Committees (2011, background): “Similarly, Ruddock et al. (2006) find no association between nonaudit fees and earnings conservatism.”
• The impact of audit committee expertise on audit quality: Evidence from UK audit fees (2017, background): “In a New Zealand study, Rainsbury et al. (2009), defining expertise in terms of a dummy variable representing the presence of one or more qualified accountants on the audit committee, also fail to find that expertise has a significant impact on audit fees.”