The Clermont Escherichia coli phylo-typing method revisited: improvement of specificity and detection of new phylo-groups.
By O. Clermont, Julia K. Christenson, E. Denamur, D. Gordon. Environmental Microbiology Reports, 2013
1,613 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Epidemiology, Molecular Biology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dce1d7d4d38b98f6e559dde26f7248d66c651365
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Molecular Biology
- Yulei Fan
- M. Nicolas-Chanoine
- Nabil-Fareed Alikhan
- Zhemin Zhou
- X. Bertrand
- Mark Achtman
- J. Madec
- K. Mohamed
Citations in the corpus
- Environmental Escherichia coli: ecology and public health implications—a review (2017, methodology): “A, B1, B2 and D) (Clermont et al. 2013).”
- The EnteroBase user's guide, with case studies on Salmonella transmissions, Yersinia pestis phylogeny, and Escherichia core genomic diversity (2019, background): “…bacterial isolates are routinely assigned to haplogroups or clades by PCR tests for the presence of variably present genes from the accessory genome (Clermont et al. 2013) or by programs that identify the presence of those genes in genomic sequences (Beghain et al. 2018; Waters et al. 2018).”
- Escherichia coli ST131, an Intriguing Clonal Group (2014, methodology): “(47, 48), other single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based methods can be used to determine whether the isolate concerned belongs to the ST131 lineage.”