Axion dark matter detection with cold molecules

By P. Graham, S. Rajendran. 2011

134 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Current techniques cannot detect axion dark matter over much of its parameter space, particularly in the theoretically well-motivated region where the axion decay constant f_a lies near the GUT and Planck scales. We suggest a novel experimental method to search for QCD axion dark matter in this region. The axion field oscillates at a frequency equal to its mass when it is a component of dark matter. These oscillations induce time varying CP-odd nuclear moments, such as electric dipole and Schiff moments. The coupling between internal atomic fields and these nuclear moments gives rise to time varying shifts to atomic energy levels. These effects can be enhanced by using elements with large Schiff moments such as the light Actinides, and states with large spontaneous parity violation, such as molecules in a background electric field. The energy level shift in such a molecule can be ~ 10^-24 eV or larger. While challenging, this energy shift may be observable in a molecular clock configuration with technology presently under development. The detectability of this energy shift is enhanced by the fact that it is a time varying shift whose oscillation frequency is set by fundamental physics and is therefore independent of the details of the experiment. This signal is most easily observed in the sub-MHz range, allowing detection when f_a is > 10^16 GeV, and possibly as low as 10^15 GeV. A discovery in such an experiment would not only reveal the nature of dark matter and confirm the axion as the solution to the strong CP problem, it would also provide a glimpse of physics at the highest energy scales, far beyond what can be directly probed in the laboratory.

Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dcc2465251a8b752e5be6ac71c94271acb4c678a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. A. Ringwald
  2. J. Redondo
  3. P. Graham
  4. S. Rajendran
  5. Igor G. Irastorza
  6. Dmitry Budker
  7. D. DeMille
  8. J. Mardon

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. J. Redondo
  2. A. Ringwald
  3. Igor G. Irastorza
  4. P. Graham
  5. S. Rajendran
  6. M. Goodsell
  7. J. Mardon
  8. M. Cicoli

Citations in the corpus