Infrared Photometry of Late-M, L, and T Dwarfs

By S. Leggett, D. Golimowski, Xiaohui Fan, T. Geballe, G. Knapp, J. Brinkmann, István Csabai, James E. Gunn, S. Hawley, Todd J. Henry and 9 more. 2001

259 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present ZJHKL′M′ photometry of a sample of 58 late M, L, and T dwarfs, most of which are identified from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and the Two Micron All-Sky Survey. Near-infrared spectra and spectral classifications for most of this sample are presented in a companion paper by Geballe et al. We derive the luminosities of 18 dwarfs in the sample with known parallaxes, and the results imply that the effective temperature range for the L dwarfs in our sample is approximately 2200-1300 K and for the T dwarfs 1300-800 K. We obtained new photometric data at the United Kingdom Infrared Telescope for: 42 dwarfs at Z, 34 dwarfs at JHK, 21 dwarfs at L', as well as M' data for two L dwarfs and two T dwarfs. The M' data provide the first accurate photometry for L and T dwarfs in this bandpass—for a T2 and a T5 dwarf, we find K-M′ = 1.2 and 1.6, respectively. These colors are much bluer than predicted by published models, suggesting that CO may be more abundant in these objects than expected, as has been found for the T6 dwarf Gl 229B. We also find that K-L' increases monotonically through most of the M, L, and T subclasses, but it is approximately constant between types L6 and T5, restricting its usefulness as a temperature indicator. The degeneracy is probably due to the onset of CH4 absorption at the blue edge of the L' bandpass. The JHK colors of L dwarfs show significant scatter, suggesting that the fluxes in these bandpasses are sensitive to variations in photospheric dust properties. The H-K colors of the later T dwarfs also show some scatter, which we suggest is due to variations in pressure-induced H2 opacity, which is sensitive to gravity and metallicity.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Spectroscopy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dcae6985b01c06ae2e3cd2bb9172f7520737ef3f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. A. Burgasser
  2. Michael C. Liu
  3. J. D. Kirkpatrick
  4. K. Luhman
  5. M. Marley
  6. T. Dupuy
  7. Kelle Cruz
  8. D. Schneider

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. A. Burgasser
  2. J. D. Kirkpatrick
  3. M. Marley
  4. T. Tsuji
  5. K. Lodders
  6. Michael C. Liu
  7. Kelle Cruz
  8. R. Freedman

In Spectroscopy

  1. A. Burgasser
  2. K. Luhman
  3. J. D. Kirkpatrick
  4. Michael C. Liu
  5. M. Cushing
  6. Kelle Cruz
  7. M. Marley
  8. L. Hillenbrand

Citations in the corpus