Attack and defence: interactions between echolocating bats and their insect prey

By Gareth J. F. Jones, J. Rydell. 2003

89 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dca77769a2a48f3624c74b262c1703487ef5fbf0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. S. Swift
2. Björn M. Siemers
3. E. Kalko
4. C. Korine

Citations in the corpus

• Differences in sensory ecology contribute to resource partitioning in the bats Myotis bechsteinii and Myotis nattereri (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) (2006, background): “Tympanate moth species are able to detect the echolocation calls of bats and avoid capture (Fullard and Thomas 1981; Jones and Rydell 2003), so bats that can hunt by listening and can use low-amplitude echolocation calls for spatial orientation only are able to include more moths in their diet (Swif”