Collecting and analyzing microstructures in three dimensions: A fully automated approach

By J. Spowart, Herbert E. Mullens, B. Puchala. 2003

155 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The role of heterogeneous deformation on damage nucleation at grain boundaries in single phase metals (2009, background): “While orientation imaging is valuable, it is only recently 3-dimensional (e.g. Spowart et al., 2003; Zaafarani et al., 2006; Konrad et al., 2006), and it lacks angular accuracy ( 1 uncertainty in orientation).”
Generation of 3D representative volume elements for heterogeneous materials: A review (2018, methodology): “State of the art serial sectioning studies of inclusion composites commonly combine optical microscopy with grinding and polishing [305,78,306], AFM with ultramicrotome cutting [303,307] and SEM with ultramicrotome cutting for softer materials such as polymers or aluminum [308,307] or, for harder ma”
Key computational modeling issues in Integrated Computational Materials Engineering (2013, unknown): “structure datasets [151–162].”