Guiding Semi-Supervision with Constraint-Driven Learning
By Ming-Wei Chang, Lev-Arie Ratinov, Dan Roth. 2007
240 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Representation & Self-Supervised Learning
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Representation & Self-Supervised Learning
- Andrew McCallum
- Burr Settles
- Percy Liang
- Gregory Druck
- Dan Roth
- Tom Michael Mitchell
- Daniel Klein
- Sebastian Riedel
Citations in the corpus
- Benefits of Intermediate Annotations in Reading Comprehension (2020, background): “Our auxiliary training with intermediate annotations is inspired by extensive related work on training models using side information or domain knowledge beyond labels (Mann and McCallum, 2008; Chang et al., 2007; Ganchev et al., 2010; Rocktaschel et al., 2015).”
- Injecting Logical Background Knowledge into Embeddings for Relation Extraction (2015, methodology): “…Supervised Learning Our work is also inspired by weakly supervised approaches (Ganchev et al., 2010) that use structural constraints as a source of indirect supervision, and have been used for several NLP tasks (Chang et al., 2007; Mann and McCallum, 2008; Druck et al., 2009; Singh et al., 2010).”
- Label-Free Supervision of Neural Networks with Physics and Domain Knowledge (2016, background): “Natural language processing has seen many successful applications of constraint learning [10, 2, 5], and the recent work of [12] has provided a fresh perspective on the idea of learning with labeling functions, rather than labels, in the form of Data Programming.”
- Mapping to Declarative Knowledge for Word Problem Solving (2017, neutral): “More recent approaches tried to incorporate knowledge in the form of constraints or expectations from the output (Roth and tau Yih, 2004; wei Chang et al., 2007; Chang et al., 2012; Ganchev et al., 2010; Smith and Eisner, 2006; Naseem et al., 2010; Bisk and Hockenmaier, 2012; Gimpel and Bansal,…”
- Generalized Expectation Criteria for Semi-Supervised Learning of Conditional Random Fields (2008, methodology): “Labeled instances are available, the technique described in CRR07 can be used.”
- Posterior Regularization for Structured Latent Variable Models (2010, methodology): “Chang et al. (2007) report similar results for their constraint-driven learning framework.”
- Boosting Entity Linking Performance by Leveraging Unlabeled Documents (2019, background): “This approach is reminiscent of constraint-driven learning (Chang et al., 2007), as well as of multi-instance learning methods common in relation extraction (Riedel et al., 2010; Surdeanu et al., 2012).”
- Learning from labeled features using generalized expectation criteria (2008, unknown): “Chang, Ratinov, and Roth [2] propose an EM-like algorithm that incorporates prior constraints into semi-supervised training of structured output models.”
- Toward an Architecture for Never-Ending Language Learning (2010, unknown): “" Chang, Ratinov, and Roth (2007) also showed that enforcing constraints given as domain knowledge can improve semi-supervised learning.”
- Semi-Supervised Learning via Generalized Maximum Entropy (2010, background): “were one of the first to guide semi-supervised algorithms with constraints (Chang et al., 2007).”
- Estimating Accuracy from Unlabeled Data (2014, methodology): “Moreover, there has been work at developing more robust semi-supervised learning algorithms by using the concept of agreement rates [Collins and Singer, 1999] or some task specific constraints [Chang et al., 2007] to decide what should be added to the training data set.”
- Modeling Relations and Their Mentions without Labeled Text (2010, methodology): “Our work is based on constraint-driven semi-supervised learning [6, 16].”
- Confidence Driven Unsupervised Semantic Parsing (2011, methodology): “Our unsupervised approach follows a self training protocol (Yarowsky, 1995; McClosky et al., 2006; Reichart and Rappoport, 2007b) enhanced with constraints restricting the output space (Chang et al., 2007; Chang et al., 2009).”
- Zero-shot Learning of Classifiers from Natural Language Quantification (2018, background): “Prominent among these are the Constraint-driven learning (Chang et al., 2007a), Generalized Expectation (Mann and McCallum, 2010) and Posterior Regularization (Ganchev et al., 2010) and Bayesian Measurements (Liang et al., 2009) frameworks.”
- Iterative parameter mixing for distributed large-margin training of structured predictors for natural language processing (2015, background): “The first is a phrase-structure feature set, based on the work of Collins (2000); Charniak & Johnson (2005); Huang (2008b).”
- Ontological Smoothing for Relation Extraction with Minimal Supervision (2012, background): “(Chang, Ratinov, and Roth 2007; Smith and Eisner 2005; Bellare and McCallum 2009) allow learning with soft constraints, for example in the form of labeled features.”