Epigenetic aspects of somaclonal variation in plants
By Shawn M. Kaeppler, H. Kaeppler, Y. Rhee. Plant Molecular Biology, 2000
789 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Molecular Biology, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dc9978f9ba4cb52cb7cae838469d755be57e24c5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Molecular Biology
- J. van Staden
- M. Lelu-Walter
- M. Bairu
- S. Delauré
- J. Ross-Ibarra
- V. Jiménez
- A. Aremu
- Katleen M. J. Butaye
In Plant Science
Citations in the corpus
- Conservation of plant genetic resources by cryopreservation. (2011, background): “DNA methylation can play a role in somaclonal variation (Kaeppler et al., 2000), but Channuntapipat et al. (2003) and Harding (2004) suggest that these changes may not be induced by cryopreservation but are the results of the whole process of in vitro culture and regeneration.”
- Somaclonal variation in plants: causes and detection methods (2011, background): “…deal with specific aspect(s) of somaclonal variation (Lee and Phillips 1988; Bajaj 1990; Karp 1994), specific species of plants (Reuveni et al. 1993; Sahijram et al. 2003) or specific application(s) of somaclonal variation (Larkin and Scowcroft 1981; Karp 1995; Kaeppler et al. 2000; Jain 2001).”
- Consequences and Mitigation Strategies of Abiotic Stresses in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under the Changing Climate (2021, background): “Somaclonal variation is the genetic variability produced during cell culture in vitro [158], which is also known as tissue culture-induced variation [202].”
- Stress and aberrant phenotypes in vitro culture (2003, background): “The relative significance of ge- of cell death i.e. chromatin fragmentation and DNA netic, i.e. base sequence or chromosome variation, laddering (Krishnamurthy et al., 2000). versus epigenetic variation, in somaclonal variation in plants needs to be elucidated (Kaeppler et al., 2000).”
- Involvement of DNA methylation in tree development and micropropagation (2007, background): “Propagation-associated stress conditions often result in instability of the plant genome and breakdown of normal controls as a result of epigenetic effects due to (associated with) changes in DNA methylation (Karp 1994; Jaligot et al. 2000; Kaeppler et al. 2000).”
- In vitro propagation of the neotropical giant bamboo, Guadua angustifolia Kunth, through axillary shoot proliferation (2006, background): “Moreover, if this procedure is going to be implemented for large-scale propagation of G. angustifolia, the amount of somaclonal variation, an important source of variability in vitro (Kaeppler et al. 2000), has to be assessed.”
- Biological characterization of young and aged embryogenic cultures of Pinus pinaster (Ait.) (2009, background): “primarily as epigenetic change that alters gene expression patterns without changes in the DNA sequence (Russo et al. 1996; Kaeppler et al. 2000).”
- Development and evaluation of in vitro somaclonal variation in strawberry for improved horticultural traits (2009, neutral): “Epigenetic variation is often unstable and can disappear either after plants are removed from culture or within a few clonal or sexual generations (Kaeppler et al., 2000), while genetic variation is heritable (Skirvin et al., 1994).”
- Transposable elements contribute to activation of maize genes in response to abiotic stress (2014, background): “Tissue culture is a complex stress that can result in the activation of DNA transposons in maize and retrotransposons in rice [30]-[31].”
- Approaches to Minimize Variation of Transgene Expression in Plants (2005, background): “For instance, another cause of transgene expression variation, yet acknowledged to be directly subject to the applied transformation method, is the occurrence of somaclonal variation which is generally defined as genetic and phenotypic variation among clonally propagated plants of a single donor clo”
- Somaclonal Variation in Tissue Culture: A Case Study with Olive (2012, background): “Temporary changes result from epigenetic or physiological effects and are nonheritable and reversible [9].”