Technological and Environmental Differences in the European Banking Industries

By Mohamed E. Chaffai, M. Dietsch, Ana Lozano-Vivas. 2001

128 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dc90614935061114fb9d0092f7d26f09baf4ea45

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management Science and Operations Research

Citations in the corpus

The Impact of Macroeconomic and Regulatory Factors on Bank Efficiency: A Non-Parametric Analysis of Hong Kong's Banking System (2006, methodology): “parametric studies by Akhigbe and McNulty, 2003, Berger and Mester, 2003, Chaffai et al, 2001 and”
Productivity change in European banking: A comparison of parametric and non-parametric approaches (2004, methodology): “Chaffai et al. (2001) use a Malmquist type index that allows for intercountry productivity differences to be broken down into pure technological and environmental effects.”
Is There a Single Frontier in a Single European Banking Market? (2007, background): “Recent research initiatives attempt to avoid the bias inherent in cross-border bank efficiency comparisons by incorporating country-specific environmental conditions (cf. Dietsch and Lozano-Vivas, 2000; Chaffai et al., 2001; LozanoVivas et al., 2001; Sathye, 2002; Grigorian and Manole, 2002; Lozano-”
Bank Efficiency the Role of Bank Strategy and Local Market Conditions (2004, background): “As a result, the assumption of a single frontier remains an unsettled issue in the efficiency literature (Dietsch and Lozano-Vivas, 2000; Chaffai et al., 2001; Lozano-Vivas et al., 2001; Bikker, 2002).”
Bank modelling methodologies: A comparative non-parametric analysis of efficiency in the Japanese banking sector (2009, methodology): “For example, the Intermediation approach has been recently modelled by Altunbas et al (2001), Drake and Simper (2002), and Mertans and Urga (2001); and the Production approach by Cavallo and Rossi (2001), Chaffai et al (2001), Limi (2004) and LozanoVivas et al (2002).”
Efficiency in Islamic and conventional banking: an international comparison (2010, background): “This study will therefore join the limited number of studies using an output distance function approach to judge cross-country banking efficiency ( Chaffai et al. 2001; Olgu 2006), and, to our knowledge, is the first cross-country study of Islamic and conventional bank efficiency that has employed ”