Lagrangian Intersection Floer Theory: Anomaly and Obstruction, Part I
By K. Fukaya, Yong-Geun Oh, H. Ohta, K. Ôno. 2010
456 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dc80bf1da2f712446e34c56c51a0604194b3223e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Helmut Hofer
- K. Wysocki
- E. Zehnder
- O. Cornea
- P. Biran
- P. Seidel
- T. Ekholm
- Frederick J. Bourgeois III
Citations in the corpus
- Lagrangian cobordism. I (2011, background): “ on L0, L1 (such as orientability and prescribed spin structures) the moduli spaces of Floer strips can be canonically oriented which imply the sings ε(u) ∈ Z, hence one can work with any ring K. See [FOOO3] for a detailed account on how to define orientations in Floer theory. Under the preceding ass”
- Homological mirror symmetry for Brieskorn–Pham singularities (2009, background): “It is an A∞-category whose spaces of morphisms are given by Lagrangian intersection Floer complexes, and A∞-operations are defined by counting virtual numbers of stable maps of genus zero with Lagrangian boundary conditions [5].”
- Polyfold and Fredholm Theory (2014, background): “ give precisely the data from which one can define the GromovWitten invariants, see [28]. Remark 4.33. There is, of course, a large literature on Gromov-Witten invariants and further developments, see [13, 14, 35, 36, 48, 49, 52, 39, 40, 41, 42]. All the methods differ. In some sense, all the approach”