Learning brain connectivity of Alzheimer’s disease by sparse inverse covariance estimation

By Shuai Huang, Jing Li, Liang Sun, Jieping Ye, Adam Fleisher, Teresa Wu, Kewei Chen, Eric M. Reiman. NeuroImage, 2010

346 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Rapid advances in neuroimaging techniques provide great potentials for study of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Existing findings have shown that AD is closely related to alteration in the functional brain network, i.e., the functional connectivity between different brain regions. In this paper, we propose a method based on sparse inverse covariance estimation (SICE) to identify functional brain connectivity networks from PET data. Our method is able to identify both the connectivity network structure and strength for a large number o f brain regions with small sample sizes. We apply the proposed method to the PET data of AD, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and normal control (NC) subjects. Compared with NC, AD shows decrease in the amount of inter-region functional connectivity within the temporal lobe especially between the area around hippocampus and other regions and increase in the amount of connectivity within the frontal lobe as well as between the parietal and occipital lobes. Also, AD shows weaker between-lobe connectivity than within-lobe connectivity and weaker between-hemisphere connectivity, compared with NC. In addition to being a method for knowledge discovery about AD, the proposed SICE method can also be used for classifying new subjects, which makes it a suitable approach for novel connectivity-based AD biomarker identification. Our experiments show that the best sensitivity and specificity our method can achieve in AD vs. NC classification are 88% and 88%, respectively.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dc758bcee8cd75e8f9eec9eee24e9449df4eb34e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. Lourens J. Waldorp
  2. Jonas M. B. Haslbeck
  3. Sacha Epskamp
  4. Denny Borsboom
  5. Richard J. McNally
  6. Hudson F. Golino

In Psychiatry and Mental health

  1. Lourens J. Waldorp

In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

  1. Lourens J. Waldorp

Citations in the corpus