The language of landscape ecologists and planners: A comparative content analysis of concepts used in landscape ecology

By Marc Antrop. 2001

126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dc64d807110e5d9e5bc58e44c03657234601396c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. J. Fischer
2. David B. Lindenmayer
3. A. Hermann
4. Sabine Schleifer
5. I. Fazey
6. T. Wrbka
7. J. Kenter

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. David B. Lindenmayer
2. J. Fischer
3. I. Fazey
4. T. Wrbka
5. Jordi Bascompte
6. Gentile Francesco Ficetola
7. Ross Goldingay
8. Anders Nielsen

Citations in the corpus

• Making the matrix matter: challenges in Australian grazing landscapes (2005, background): “The concept of ‘patches’ is central to many ecological theories (Stephens and Krebs 1986; Wiens et al. 1993; Antrop 2001) and conservation strategies (e.”
• The Concept of Ecosystem Services Regarding Landscape Research: A Review (2011, background): “The central notion in landscape development has always been that people are part of the landscape and that landscapes are changed for their benefit (Linehan and Gross, 1998; Antrop, 2001).”