How good is a PCR efficiency estimate: Recommendations for precise and robust qPCR efficiency assessments

By D. Svec, Ales Tichopád, V. Novosadova, M. W. Pfaffl, M. Kubista. Biomolecular Detection and Quantification, 2015

501 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We have examined the imprecision in the estimation of PCR efficiency by means of standard curves based on strategic experimental design with large number of technical replicates. In particular, how robust this estimation is in terms of a commonly varying factors: the instrument used, the number of technical replicates performed and the effect of the volume transferred throughout the dilution series. We used six different qPCR instruments, we performed 1–16 qPCR replicates per concentration and we tested 2–10 μl volume of analyte transferred, respectively. We find that the estimated PCR efficiency varies significantly across different instruments. Using a Monte Carlo approach, we find the uncertainty in the PCR efficiency estimation may be as large as 42.5% (95% CI) if standard curve with only one qPCR replicate is used in 16 different plates. Based on our investigation we propose recommendations for the precise estimation of PCR efficiency: (1) one robust standard curve with at least 3–4 qPCR replicates at each concentration shall be generated, (2) the efficiency is instrument dependent, but reproducibly stable on one platform, and (3) using a larger volume when constructing serial dilution series reduces sampling error and enables calibration across a wider dynamic range.

Subfields: Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dc596ae23a36b59c54b15a3bdd031de46ac2e92f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Molecular Biology

Citations in the corpus

Obstacles and opportunities in the functional analysis of extracellular vesicle RNA – an ISEV position paper (2017, background): “fication methods, or by conducting absolute quantitation of studied transcripts.[98,99] New advances in both EV isolation techniques and”
Analytical sensitivity and efficiency comparisons of SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR primer-probe sets (2020, unknown): “1B ), which match the criteria for an efficient qRT-PCR assay 11 .”
dPCR: A Technology Review (2018, background): “Differences in PCR efficiencies can sig ificantly affect the quantification accuracy [3].”
Environmental DNA (eDNA) detects the invasive crayfishes Orconectes rusticus and Pacifastacus leniusculus in large lakes of North America (2017, background): “A serial dilution of the gBlock fragment provided a range in copy numbers for the quantification of eDNA unknowns (Gunawardana et al., 2014; Renshaw et al., 2015; Svec et al., 2015).”