Environmental Management: Testing the Win‐Win Model

By N. Karagozoglu, Martin Lindell. 2000

158 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dc535d36e39d4d9bdda78d76cefd31538fb5ed03

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

1. Elisabeth Albertini
2. Petros Vourvachis
3. T. Woodward

In Strategy and Management

1. Elisabeth Albertini
2. Petros Vourvachis
3. T. Woodward

Citations in the corpus

• A Meta-analytical investigation of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance (2005, unknown): “…Grimm (2000) USA 437 1,96 1 0,094** 72 Christmann (2000) USA 88 0,32 3 0,043 73 Dowell, Hart & Yeung (2000) USA 338 2,70 1 0,148*** 74 Karagozoglu & Lindell (2000) USA 83 3,90 1 0,404*** 75 McWilliams & Siegel (2000) USA 524 -0,03 3 -0,002 76 Graves & Waddock (2000) USA 36 3,56 4 0,520*** 77…”
• Does Environmental Management Improve Financial Performance? A Meta-Analytical Review (2013, background): “…12 0.157 Integration of environmental issues into strategic process ROI, earnings growth, sales growths, market share Environmental compliance Karagozoglu and Lindell (2000) 83 4 0.281 Environmental strategy Profit, environmental advantage Competitive advantage Khanna and Damon (1999) 702 2…”
• The concept of environmental performance and its measurement in empirical studies (2011, unknown): “While Adamczyk et al. (2009) explicitly suggest to evaluate EP on this basis, Karagozoglu and Lindell (2000) see environmental innovativeness as a result of EP.”