Multiple agree with clitics: person complementarity vs. omnivorous number

By Andrew Nevins. 2011

303 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Philosophy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dc4b0aad3442a44aa350d5cd49fd5a3380641892

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Language and Linguistics

1. Ruth Kramer
2. Vicki Carstens
3. Gabi Danon
4. M. Diercks

In Philosophy

1. Vicki Carstens
2. Ruth Kramer

Citations in the corpus

• Clitic doubling or object agreement: the view from Amharic (2014, methodology): “This correlates with recent clitic doubling literature where the movement of the clitic is licensed by an Agree relation between a functional head and a DP (Béjar and Rezac 2003; Rezac 2004, 2008; Roberts 2010; Nevins 2011; Preminger 2011).”
• Delayed Valuation: A Reanalysis of Goal Features, “Upward” Complementizer Agreement, and the Mechanics of Case (2016, background): “Simplifying somewhat the technical details, this is possible because the unvalued features of v are inherited by projections of v, and can initiate a continuation of the search.35 35 See Nevins 2011 for an approach in terms of simultaneous Multiple Agree.”