The Endogeneity of the Optimum Currency Area Criteria, Intra-industry Trade, and EMU Enlargement

362 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Impact of the Global Financial Crisis on Business Cycles in Asian Emerging Economies (2010, neutral): “Fidrmuc (2004) and Artis et al. (2008) show that intra-industry trade is a better indicator of business cycle asymmetries than simple trade intensities.”
A Common Currency Peg in East Asia? Perspectives from Western Europe (2003, background): “Frankel and Rose (1998) argue that countries are likely to face more similar shocks as trade increases, implying that supply shocks will become more highly correlated as economic integration progresses.”
Business Cycle Synchronization in the Enlarged EU (2008, neutral): “Previous studies (for instance, Korhonen 2003, and Fidrmuc 2004 ) also tended to conclude that Hungary and Slovenia are well integrated, but high correlation for Poland is rarely found (an exception is Artis et al. 2005).”
Can the Standard International Business Cycle Model Explain the Relation between Trade and Comovement? (2005, neutral): “Among the cross-section and panel empirical papers, to our knowledge only Fidrmuc (2004) attempts to control for common third-party trade.”
Trade Network Centrality and Currency Risk Premia (2019, background): “This measure is simply Equation (32) where ρij is replaced by bilateral trade intensity, following the findings of Frankel and Rose (1998)7.”