Quantifiers in Than-Clauses
By Sigrid Beck. 2010
49 citations recorded by the source corpus.
The paper reexamines the interpretations that quantifiers in "than"-clauses give rise to. It develops an analysis that combines an interval semantics for the "than"-clause with a standard semantics for the comparative operator. In order to mediate between the two, interpretive mechanisms like maximality and maximal informativity determine selection of a point from an interval. The interval semantics allows local interpretation of the quantifier. Selection predicts which interpretation this leads to. Cases in which the prediction appears not to be met are explained via recourse to independently attested external factors (e.g. the interpretive possibilities of indefinites). The goal of the paper is to achieve coverage of the relevant data while maintaining a simple semantics for the comparative. A secondary objective is to reexamine, restructure and extend the set of data considered in connection with the problem of quantifiers in "than"-clauses. doi:10.3765/sp.3.1 BibTeX info
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Language and Linguistics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dc3ce5ca1ba41321e2328e8cf050111fce994e3c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Language and Linguistics
Citations in the corpus
- The grammar of standards: Judge-dependence, purpose-relativity, and comparison classes in degree constructions (2014, background): “Maximisation in the domain of degrees in particular has been claimed to be at work in semantics of amount relatives (Grosu and Landman, 1998) and the standard clauses in comparative constructions (von Stechow, 1984; Heim, 2001; Beck, 2010):”