Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits
By Pieter Kok, William J. Munro, Kae Nemoto, Timothy C. Ralph, Jonathan P. Dowling, Gerard J. Milburn. 2005
2,481 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Linear optics with photon counting is a prominent candidate for practical quantum computing. The protocol by Knill, Laflamme, and Milburn [2001, Nature (London) 409, 46] explicitly demonstrates that efficient scalable quantum computing with single photons, linear optical elements, and projective measurements is possible. Subsequently, several improvements on this protocol have started to bridge the gap between theoretical scalability and practical implementation. The original theory and its improvements are reviewed, and a few examples of experimental two-qubit gates are given. The use of realistic components, the errors they induce in the computation, and how these errors can be corrected is discussed.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Electrical and Electronic Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dc30d510ec6b30e26082bf40b403b4c82f909e10
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Franco Nori
- Mark Saffman
- Göran Wendin
- Sahel Ashhab
- Steven M. Girvin
- Mikhail D. Lukin
- Darrick E. Chang
- Alán Aspuru-Guzik
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Darrick E. Chang
- P. Lodahl
- Kohei M. Itoh
- Fabio Sciarrino
- E. Demler
- Shaul Mukamel
- K. Dorfman
- F. Schlawin
Citations in the corpus
- Towards quantum chemistry on a quantum computer. (2009, background): “Not only does this approach offer a legitimate path to building a large-scale quantum compute”
- Experimental demonstration of a heralded entanglement source (2010, background): “F = Tr(r̂ F+ ∣∣ lsskF+∣∣) = 1 4 (1 + kŝxŝxl − kŝyŝyl + kŝzŝzl) (6) where F+ ∣∣ lsskF+∣∣ = (1)4 (Î + ŝxŝx − ŝyŝy + ŝzŝz), ŝz1⁄4 |HlkH| 2 |VlkV|, ŝx1⁄4 |þlkþ |2 |2lk2| and ŝy1⁄4 |RlkR| 2 |LlkL|.”
- Performance and structure of single-mode bosonic codes (2017, background): “While many current linear-optical CV encodings use two modes per qubit in a “dual-rail” scheme [5,6] and CV logical qubits may consist of several modes in the long term, here we focus on a single mode since its theoretical limitations are not yet well understood and since it is useful for communicat”
- Crystallization of strongly interacting photons in a nonlinear optical fibre (2007, background): “Such states therefore could be used as an input for sub-shot noise interferometers [41, 42], or in extension to schemes for quantum computing [43] or quantum cryptography [44] that rely on single photons.”
- Near-deterministic quantum teleportation and resource-efficient quantum computation using linear optics and hybrid qubits (2011, background): “Certain properties of light can be useful to implement qubits, i.e., the basic units for quantum computation [4].”
- Quantum Chemistry in the Age of Quantum Computing. (2018, methodology): “a qubit as j0iand j1i, the wave function of an n-qubit quantum 27 computer can be expressed as a superposition of 2n computational basis states: j i= X i 1;i 2; ;in2f0;1g ai 1i 2 inji 1i ji 2i j ini: (13) For describing a computational basis state the Kronecker product symbol is commonly dropped for”
- Integrated multimode interferometers with arbitrary designs for photonic boson sampling (2013, background): “[9] P.”
- Hybrid discrete- and continuous-variable quantum information (2014, neutral): “but the required overhead is massive [5].”
- Optimal quantum cloning of orbital angular momentum photon qubits through Hong–Ou–Mandel coalescence (2009, background): “, the construction of quantum logic gates for quantum information processin”
- Direct generation of three-photon polarization entanglement (2014, background): “In most cases these applications require entangled states of light, but because photons are notoriously weakly interacting, creating entanglement between photons after they have been produced is challenging [1].”