How Should a Robot Assess Risk? Towards an Axiomatic Theory of Risk in Robotics

By Anirudha Majumdar, Marco Pavone. 2017

234 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Endowing robots with the capability of assessing risk and making risk-aware decisions is widely considered a key step toward ensuring safety for robots operating under uncertainty. But, how should a robot quantify risk? A natural and common approach is to consider the framework whereby costs are assigned to stochastic outcomes - an assignment captured by a cost random variable. Quantifying risk then corresponds to evaluating a risk metric, i.e., a mapping from the cost random variable to a real number. Yet, the question of what constitutes a "good" risk metric has received little attention within the robotics community. The goal of this paper is to explore and partially address this question by advocating axioms that risk metrics in robotics applications should satisfy in order to be employed as rational assessments of risk. We discuss general representation theorems that precisely characterize the class of metrics that satisfy these axioms (referred to as distortion risk metrics), and provide instantiations that can be used in applications. We further discuss pitfalls of commonly used risk metrics in robotics, and discuss additional properties that one must consider in sequential decision making tasks. Our hope is that the ideas presented here will lead to a foundational framework for quantifying risk (and hence safety) in robotics applications.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. R´emi Munos
  2. Georg Ostrovski
  3. Will Dabney
  4. David Silver
  5. Yuxi Li
  6. Marc G. Bellemare
  7. Sergey Levine
  8. Martin Müller

In Management Science and Operations Research

  1. David Silver
  2. R´emi Munos
  3. Will Dabney
  4. Georg Ostrovski
  5. Marc G. Bellemare
  6. Peter Pastor
  7. Mrinal Kalakrishnan
  8. Karol Hausman

In Statistics and Probability

  1. David Silver
  2. R´emi Munos
  3. Georg Ostrovski
  4. Will Dabney
  5. Nan Jiang
  6. Csaba Szepesvari
  7. Bruno Scherrer
  8. Amir-massoud Farahmand

Citations in the corpus