Nutrient Cycling by Animals in Freshwater Ecosystems

By M. Vanni. 2002

1,144 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Chemistry, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dc1ebcf0de7cd25643e180924d6d1cae59c983b5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Chemistry

1. Erik Jeppesen
2. P. Glibert
3. J. Burkholder
4. S. Hall
5. C. Vaughn
6. T. Kana
7. C. Atkinson
8. M. Søndergaard

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. G. Woodward
2. C. Vaughn
3. C. Atkinson
4. David L. Strayer
5. Erik Jeppesen
6. G. Grenouillet
7. Lise Comte
8. M. Vanni

Citations in the corpus

• Challenges for freshwater invertebrate conservation (2006, background): “Invertebrates regulate rates of primary production, decomposition, water clarity, thermal stratification, and nutrient cycling in lakes, streams, and rivers (e.g., Mazumder et al. 1990, Feminella and Hawkins 1995, Wallace and Webster 1996, Graça 2001, Vaughn and Hakenkamp 2001, Vanni 2002).”
• The key role of zooplankton in ecosystem services: A perspective of interaction between zooplankton and fish recruitment (2021, background): “Zooplankton has also a strong effect on biomass stocks of other planktonic groups, in fact zooplankton can alter the concentration of prey populations (by consumption) and predator populations (by being consumed), consequently having effects on fish biomass (Vanni, 2002).”
• From Elements to Function: Toward Unifying Ecological Stoichiometry and Trait-Based Ecology (2017, background): “, the excreted N:P ratio will increase with increasing resource N:P ratio (Vanni, 2002).”
• Abundance, biomass production, nutrient content, and the possible role of terrestrial salamanders in Missouri Ozark forest ecosystems (2014, background): “The transfer of energy and nutrients largely depends on the role of animals in the movement of biomass between trophic levels (Vanni 2002) or translocation of biomass between ecosystems (Polis et al. 1997).”
• Ontogeny, diet shifts, and nutrient stoichiometry in fish (2007, background): “Fish can be important in nutrient cycling (Vanni 2002), and in some cases excretion by young of the year is particularly important (Kraft 1992).”
• The Stoichiometry of Nutrient Release by Terrestrial Herbivores and Its Ecosystem Consequences (2017, background): “…marine, and freshwater ecosystems (Pastor et al., 1993; McNaughton et al., 1997; Covich et al., 1999; Sirotnak and Huntly, 2000; Hunter, 2001; Vanni, 2002; Bardgett and Wardle, 2003; McIntyre et al., 2007; Cech et al., 2008; Roman and McCarthy, 2010; Metcalfe et al., 2014; Turner, 2015;…”
• Detritus, trophic dynamics and biodiversity (2004, background): “Similarly, in reservoirs in the Midwestern USA, detritivorous fish (gizzard shad) attain high biomass via consumption of allochthonous and autochthonous detritus and excrete nutrients that can stimulate phytoplankton biomass (Schaus & Vanni 2000; Vanni 2002).”
• Ecological stoichiometry in freshwater benthic systems: recent progress and perspectives (2005, background): “…ecological topics, including trophic interactions (e.g. Elser et al., 1998; Sterner et al., 1998), nutrient cycling (e.g. Elser & Urabe, 1999; Vanni, 2002), population dynamics (e.g. Schade et al., 2003; Andersen, Elser & Hessen, 2004; Moe et al., 2005), and the role of species in ecosystems…”
• On the occurrence and ecological features of deep chlorophyll maxima (DCM) in Spanish stratified lakes (2006, background): “Moreover it is well known that zooplankton can perform diel vertical migrations (e.g. for Spanish lakes in Gasol et al., 1995; King & Miracle, 1995; Boronat & Miracle, 1997; Armengol & Miracle, 2000), and might play a crucial role in the vertical nutrient transport within the lake (Vanni, 2002).”
• The adaptive capacity of lake food webs: from individuals to ecosystems (2016, background): “Predaceous fi sh are also important for moving nutrients across habitat boundaries (Vanni 2002 ) and elemental stoichiometry could be applied within our framework to trace how fi sh foraging behavior affects nutrient transport, levels, and limitations across changing environmental conditions (see…”
• The functional role of native freshwater mussels in the fluvial benthic environment (2006, background): “…Biology (2006) 51, 460–474 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01507.x 460 2006 Blackwell Publishing Ltd relatively large stream organisms are important biological processes for increasing nutrient standing stocks in recipient habitats and perhaps stimulating new primary production (Vanni, 2002).”
• Animating the Carbon Cycle (2014, background): “Resolving those mechanisms not only provides an acid test of our predictive understanding of Earth as a system (Falkowski and others 2000), but also provides insights needed to formulate actionable policy aimed at mitigating CO2 build-up in the atmosphere (Falkowski and others 2000; Houghton 2007).”
• Stoichiometrically Explicit Food Webs: Feedbacks between Resource Supply, Elemental Constraints, and Species Diversity (2009, background): “Because grazers preferentially retain nutrients limiting their growth and recycle those supplied in excess, grazers can impact the amounts and ratio at which nutrients are recycled (Elser & Urabe 1999, Sterner 1990, Vanni 2002).”