Are All Credit Default Swap Databases Equal

By Sergio Mayordomo, Juan Ignacio Peña, Eduardo Schwartz. 2013

148 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The presence of different prices in different databases for the same securities can impair the comparability of research efforts and seriously damage the management decisions based upon such research. In this study we compare the six major sources of corporate Credit Default Swap prices: GFI, Fenics, Reuters EOD, CMA, Markit and JP Morgan, using the most liquid single name 5-year CDS of the components of the leading market indexes, iTraxx (European firms) and CDX (US firms) for the period from 2004 to 2010. We find systematic differences between the data sets implying that deviations from the common trend among prices in the different databases are not purely random but are explained by idiosyncratic factors as well as liquidity, global risk and other trading factors. The lower is the amount of transaction prices available the higher is the deviation among databases. Our results suggest that the CMA database quotes lead the price discovery process in comparison with the quotes provided by other databases. Several robustness tests confirm these results.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dc1848338f2fd799f9a2be7c6ab5691d9d9d35ec

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. Christian Wagner
  2. Niels Friewald
  3. Josef Zechner

In Finance

  1. Christian Wagner
  2. Niels Friewald
  3. Josef Zechner
  4. G. Karolyi

Citations in the corpus