The Phonology of Tone and Intonation: Index

By Carlos Gussenhoven. 2004

1,065 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dc0dc2199a46ce7dfbdf75563ceaac2e2f6c59d6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Experimental and theoretical advances in prosody: A review (2010, background): “Some boundary tones, especially sentence-final ones, are often linked to semantic or pragmatic meaning, and are sometimes treated as intonational morphemes in their own right (Gussenhoven, 1984, 2004; Pierrehumbert & Hirschberg, 1990).”
Contrastive focus vs. discourse-new: Evidence from phonetic prominence in English (2012, neutral): “Indeed, many scholars (including Bolinger (1961), Jackendoff (1972), Ladd (1980), Gussenhoven (1983, 1992, 2004), Selkirk (1984, 1996), Rooth (1985, 1992), Kratzer (1991), Krifka (1992, 1993), Schwarzschild (1999), Kahnemuyipour (2004, 2009), Büring (2007), and Féry and Krifka (2008)) adopt the…”
TONAL AND ARTICULATORY MARKING OF FOCUS IN GERMAN (2007, background): “We expect an increase in prominence-lending cues ranging from broad to narrow to contrastive fo cus as a linguistic manifestation of the Effort Cod e [6] indicating increased emphasis or importance, ex pressed on three levels: • tonal fewer prenuclear accents, fewer downsteps, higher, later and stee”
Word-prosodic typology (2006, background): “…terminological ambiguity as well as conceptual confusion concerning the notion of ‘accent’ (cf. Hyman 1977a, Clements & Goldsmith 1984a, Beckman 1986, Pulleyblank 1986, van der Hulst & Smith 1988a, Salmons 1992, Ladd 1996, van der Hulst 1999a, Odden 1999, Fox 2000, Gussenhoven 2004, among others).”
A Vector Quantized Variational Autoencoder (VQ-VAE) Autoregressive Neural $F_0$ Model for Statistical Parametric Speech Synthesis (2020, methodology): “It contained 40 dilated CNN blocks with the dilation size of the n-th block as 2mod(n−1,10), n ∈ [1, 40].”
Relevance and prosody (2006, background): “Second, the effects of prosody are highly context-dependent: prosodic information interacts with information from many other sources during the comprehension process, and the same prosodic input may have different effects on different occasions.”