Trust and Networking in Inter-firm Relations: the Case of Eco-industrial Development

168 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Understanding the Organization of Industrial Ecosystems (2008, background): “Although communication and trust among actors have been recognized as important for symbiosis to occur, their exact roles have not yet been quantified in meaningful ways (Chertow 2000; Gibbs 2003; Jacobsen and Anderberg 2005).”
Organizational Perspectives of Industrial Symbiosis (2015, background): “It also paves a path for future work on the social, rather than technical, dynamics of IS development (Gibbs, 2003; Heeres, Vermeulen, & de Walle, 2004; Sinding, 2000).”
Business Networks and Economic Development in Rural Communities in the United States (2010, background): “…that occur in business networks generally have identifiable ends, the individual firms are likely to have different goals, strengths, weaknesses, and bargaining positions, and be more or less prone toward opportunistic behaviors at the expense of their partners (Gibbs, 2003; Harrigan, 1985).”
Industrial Symbiosis Dynamics and the Problem of Equivalence: Proposal for a Comparative Framework (2017, background): “In order to do so, we can distinguish technical, economic, geospatial, as well as social and institutional conditions (Gibbs 2003; Mirata 2004; BCSD-GM 1997).”