The power of we: Evidence for group-based control

By Immo Fritsche, E. Jonas, Catharina Ablasser, M. Beyer, J. Kubáň, A. Manger, M. Schultz. 2013

215 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dbe5ad639245d43a35a1d9a771cb59123f3a41af

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Kyle Nash
2. T. Proulx
3. Immo Fritsche
4. E. Jonas
5. Johannes Klackl
6. Markus Quirin
7. Dmitrij Agroskin
8. Colin Holbrook

In Social Psychology

1. Kyle Nash
2. T. Proulx
3. Immo Fritsche
4. Ian M McGregor
5. E. Jonas
6. Johannes Klackl
7. Markus Quirin
8. Dmitrij Agroskin

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Ian M McGregor
2. Immo Fritsche
3. Kyle Nash
4. E. Jonas
5. Johannes Klackl
6. Markus Quirin
7. Dmitrij Agroskin
8. Colin Holbrook

Citations in the corpus

• Understanding defensive and secure in-group positivity: The role of collective narcissism (2016, background): “Recent work (Agroskin & Jonas, 2010; Fritsche et al., 2013; Fritsche, Jonas, & Kessler, 2011) explored the role of group membership in restoring and maintaining a sense of control—one of the basic human”
• Threat and defense: From anxiety to approach (2014, methodology): “The model of group-based control (GBC; Fritsche et al., 2013; Fritsche, Jonas, & Kessler, 2011) focuses more exclusively on controlling the environment through the self (vs. being controlled by some external agent) by defining the self as a group member and acting collectively.”