LANDSCAPE-LEVEL CORRELATES OF SMALL-MAMMAL ASSEMBLAGES IN FOREST FRAGMENTS OF FARMLAND

By Thomas E. Nupp, Robert Swihart. 2000

233 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dbaff1846651b83da7b5f351d46e45f466aabfc9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Positive effects of forest fragmentation, independent of forest amount, on bat abundance in eastern Ontario, Canada (2011, background): “1999), small mammals (Nupp and Swihart 2000), and amphibians (Vallan 2000).”
Effects of forest fragmentation on small mammals in an Atlantic Forest landscape (2004, background): “…responses of small mammals to clear-cutting has been observed in temperate forests (Kirkland 1990), large-scale studies reveal significant, persistent and contrasting effects of habitat fragmentation for small mammal species in these forests (Lomolino and Perault 2000; Nupp and Swihart 2000).”
Survival of Fledgling Hooded Warblers (Wilsonia Citrina) in Small and Large Forest Fragments (2008, background): “Small mammals are known to actively prey upon Hooded Warbler eggs and nestlings (McShea 2000), and several studies have suggested that some species of small mammals may not exhibit area sensitivity (Andrén 1994, Nupp and Swihart 2000, Chalfoun et al. 2002).”
The roles of landscape context, niche breadth, and range boundaries in predicting species responses to habitat alteration (2006, background): “The southern flying squirrel requires cavity trees and habitat suitable for gliding, and the minimum suitable area of a forest patch may be limited by thermoregulatory requirements associated with huddling (Stapp et al., 1991; Nupp & Swihart, 2000).”
Rodent scatterhoarders as conditional mutualists. (2005, background): “Several studies suggest that fragmentation could potentially alter the relative abundance of rodents and shift the scatterhoarder : seed ratio (Rosenblatt et al., 1999, Nupp and Swihart, 2000; Donoso et al. 2004).”
A Hierarchical Analysis of Habitat Selection by Raccoons in Northern Indiana (2007, background): “Although numerous investigators have examined animal responses to habitat fragmentation (e.g., Nupp and Swihart 2000, Tigas et al. 2002, Swihart et al. 2003), few have directly examined the effects of crop availability or developmental stage on seasonal habitat selection by vertebrates (e.g.,…”
Beetle Responses to Habitat Fragmentation Depend on Ecological Traits, Habitat Condition, and Remnant Size (2005, background): “…that document the decline of species from habitat fragments suggest that about one-fifth to one-third of the species decline (Klein 1989 [beetles]; Saunders 1989 [birds]; Rosenblatt et al. 1999 [mammals]; Chamberlain et al. 2000 [birds]; Nupp & Swihart 2000 [mammals]; Driscoll 2004 [reptiles]).”
Theory meets reality: How habitat fragmentation research has transcended island biogeographic theory (2008, background): “4) (Laurance, 1990, 1991; Gascon et al., 1999; Nupp and Swihart, 2000; Pires et al., 2002; Sekercioglu et al., 2002; Brashares, 2003; Koh et al., 2004; Antongiovanni and Metzger, 2005).”
Shapes and functions of species–area curves: a review of possible models (2003, background): “Where area or other parameters are evaluated to explain species number, some papers may also present graphs or results where the logistic function is fitted to show species incidence (single-species probability–area) curves (e.g. Schoener & Adler, 1991; Nupp & Swihart, 2000).”
Absent or undetected? Effects of non-detection of species occurrence on wildlife-habitat models (2004, background): “a patch may be re-counted if it was revisited in different years.Details of the sampling protocol are reported elsewhere ( Nupp and Swihart, 1998; 2000 ).”
Making the matrix matter: challenges in Australian grazing landscapes (2005, background): “The role of the matrix as a connecting landscape element has been noted in various studies, for example, for many vertebrates in the Amazon basin (Gascon et al. 1999; Laurance 2002), the Iberian Lynx (Lynx pardinus) in Spain (Ferreras 2001), or small mammals in an agricultural area of central-west I”
The importance of functional connectivity in the conservation of a ground-dwelling mammal in an urban Australian landscape (2007, background): “…fragmentation in these landscapes are thought to be exerted on species principally through their sensitivities to changes in habitat area and the degree of isolation of habitat patches (Bennett 1987; Saunders and Ingram 1987; Abensperg-Traun and Smith 1999; Nupp and Swihart 2000; Cox et al. 2004).”
COMMUNITY DISASSEMBLY, BIODIVERSITY LOSS, AND THE EROSION OF AN ECOSYSTEM SERVICE (2003, background): “The most gradual pattern of changing NIP with community disassembly was seen for communities losing species in approximately the order observed in forest patches within agricultural matrices observed in Indiana and Illinois (Nupp and Swihart 1996, 2000, Rosenblatt et al. 1999) (Fig.”
Responses of ‘resistant’ vertebrates to habitat loss and fragmentation: the importance of niche breadth and range boundaries (2003, methodology): “…Distributions, 9, 1–18 (0.1–150 ha) and two sites representative of more extensive wooded areas (∼ 1500 ha) were selected to span a range of patch sizes and levels of isolation, subject to the constraint that they consisted of relatively mature, deciduous woody vegetation (Nupp & Swihart, 2000).”
Diademed Sifaka (Propithecus diadema) Ranging and Habitat Use in Continuous and Fragmented Forest: Higher Density but Lower Viability in Fragments? (2008, background): “…al. 1997, Onderdonk & Chapman 2000, Chiarello & de Melo 2001, Ganzhorn et al. 2003) and other mammals (Laurance 1991, Goodman & Rakotondravony 2000, Nupp & Swihart 2000); consequently, communities in networks of fragments often show nestedness (i.e., some species are consistently among the first…”