The International Yearbook of Environmental And Resource Economics 2006/2007: A Survey of Current Issues

By H. Folmer, T. Tietenberg. 2006

138 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/db7a535ec23ddbaea679a99ab925365f7fad33e6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

What's it worth? An examination of historical trends and future directions in environmental valuation (2004, background): “A recent review of benefit transfer issues and techniques can be found in Navrud (2004).”
Net national product, wealth, and social well-being (2000, background): “2 See, for example, Solow (1986, 1992), Hartwick (1990, 1994), Asheim (1994, 1997), Aronsson, Johansson and Löfgren (1997), Aronsson and Löfgren (1998) and Weitzman (1998). hand, as there are several reasons for seeking a welfare measure, for many purposes the most convenient index could be…”
THE INSURANCE VALUE OF BIODIVERSITY IN THE PROVISION OF ECOSYSTEM SERVICES (2005, methodology): “In this respect, 3This procedure has been inspired by Crocker and Shogren (1999, 2001, 2003) and Shogren and Crocker (1999).”
Why be wasteful when preserving a valuable resource? A review article on the cost-effectiveness of European biodiversity conservation policy (2005, background): “…and nowadays there is a large body of theoretical and empirical literature addressing this issue with the aim of both explaining existing monitoring and enforcement activities and giving recommendations on how such activities can be made more cost-effective (see Cohen 1999 for an overview).”
To Tax or Not to Tax: Alternative Approaches to Slowing Global Warming (2007, background): “…efficient market price of carbon found in the RICE model was one of the major conclusions in a review of IAMs: ‘‘Perhaps the most surprising result is the consensus that given calibrated interest rates and low future economic growth, modest controls are generally optimal’’ (Kelly and Kolstad 1999).”