Supporting Families in Reviewing and Communicating about Radiology Imaging Studies
By Matthew K. Hong, Clayton Feustel, Meeshu Agnihotri, Max Silverman, S. Simoneaux, Lauren Wilcox. 2017
47 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Diagnostic radiology reports are increasingly being made available to patients and their family members. However, these reports are not typically comprehensible to lay recipients, impeding effective communication about report findings. In this paper, we present three studies informing the design of a prototype to foster patient-clinician communication about radiology report content. First, analysis of questions posted in online health forums helped us identify patients' information needs. Findings from an elicitation study with seven radiologists provided necessary domain knowledge to guide prototype design. Finally, a clinical field study with 14 pediatric patients, their parents and clinicians, revealed positive responses of each stakeholder when using the prototype to interact with and discuss the patient's current CT or MRI report and allowed us to distill three use cases: co-located communication, preparing for the consultation, and reviewing radiology data. We draw on our findings to discuss design considerations for supporting each of these use cases.
Subfields: General Health Professions, Health Information Management
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Emma Beede
- E. Baylor
- Fred Hersch
- A. Iurchenko
- Paisan Ruamviboonsuk
- Laura M. Vardoulakis
- Lauren Wilcox
- Pranav Rajpurkar
Citations in the corpus
- A Human-Centered Evaluation of a Deep Learning System Deployed in Clinics for the Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy (2020, background): “Additional human-centered evaluative research has occurred with more robust systems deployed within a hospital, and that operate on patient data during the deployment period for the purposes of conducting small-scale pilot studies [6, 37, 22].”