The Validity and Reliability of the Problematic Internet Usage Scale

By E. Ceyhan, A. Ceyhan, A. Gürcan. 2007

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/db6f071f1908ba517dec0293287543036aa7bea2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. M. D'Arienzo
2. Valentina Boursier
3. Stéphanie Laconi
4. Mark D. Griffiths
5. Rachel Florence Rodgers
6. Henri Chabrol
7. Daria J. Kuss
8. Halley M. Pontes

Citations in the corpus

• Addiction to Social Media and Attachment Styles: A Systematic Literature Review (2019, methodology): “The main diagnostic assessment instruments for assessing the different types of internet abuse in the evaluated studies were the Internet addiction Test (IAT; Young 1998), Problematic Internet Use Scale (PIUS; Ceyhan et al. 2007), Adolescent Pathological Internet Use Scale (APIUS; Lei and Yang 2007)”
• The measurement of Internet addiction: A critical review of existing scales and their psychometric properties (2014, background): “…7 Jia & Jia, 2009 USA .85 267 Us 1.8 Preliminary proposed diagnostic criteria for pathological Internet use Wang et al., 2009 4 – – – Wang et al., 2009 China – 123 – – Problematic Internet Usage Scale (PIUS) Ceyhan, Ceyhan, & Gürcan, 2007 44 Experts’ opinions and suggestions 33 5 Ceyhan et al.,…”