Test-driven evaluation of linked data quality

By Dimitris Kontokostas, Patrick Westphal, Sören Auer, Sebastian Hellmann, Jens Lehmann, R. Cornelissen, Amrapali Zaveri. The Web Conference, 2014

315 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Linked Open Data (LOD) comprises an unprecedented volume of structured data on the Web. However, these datasets are of varying quality ranging from extensively curated datasets to crowdsourced or extracted data of often relatively low quality. We present a methodology for test-driven quality assessment of Linked Data, which is inspired by test-driven software development. We argue that vocabularies, ontologies and knowledge bases should be accompanied by a number of test cases, which help to ensure a basic level of quality. We present a methodology for assessing the quality of linked data resources, based on a formalization of bad smells and data quality problems. Our formalization employs SPARQL query templates, which are instantiated into concrete quality test case queries. Based on an extensive survey, we compile a comprehensive library of data quality test case patterns. We perform automatic test case instantiation based on schema constraints or semi-automatically enriched schemata and allow the user to generate specific test case instantiations that are applicable to a schema or dataset. We provide an extensive evaluation of five LOD datasets, manual test case instantiation for five schemas and automatic test case instantiations for all available schemata registered with Linked Open Vocabularies (LOV). One of the main advantages of our approach is that domain specific semantics can be encoded in the data quality test cases, thus being able to discover data quality problems beyond conventional quality heuristics.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/db6612061addc8b4046f769e3cecaaffe880b7e6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Jens Lehmann
  2. Sören Auer
  3. Michael Färber
  4. Achim Rettinger
  5. Frederic Bartscherer
  6. Amrapali Zaveri
  7. Carsten Menne
  8. Gerhard Weikum

In Information Systems

  1. Jens Lehmann
  2. Sören Auer
  3. Andrea Maurino
  4. Achim Rettinger
  5. Amrapali Zaveri
  6. Gerhard Weikum
  7. Fabian M. Suchanek
  8. Qi Wu

In Management Science and Operations Research

  1. Jens Lehmann
  2. Sören Auer
  3. Andrea Maurino

Citations in the corpus