Consequences of Family Policies on Childbearing Behavior: Effects or Artifacts?
By G. Neyer, Gunnar Andersson. 2007
284 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/db5b1a8f4ffb8cd230674d07b23625af1594c757
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- M. Mills
- Francesco C. Billari
- O. Thévenon
- A. Gauthier
- Ronald R. Rindfuss
- Clara H. Mulder
- P. McDonald
- E. T. te Velde
Citations in the corpus
- Homeownership Regimes and Low Fertility (2010, background): “Indeed, in an early definition, Kamerman & Kahn (1978, p. 3) include housing policies among family policies, defined as ‘everything that government does to and for the family’ (see also Neyer & Andersson, 2008).”
- Why do people postpone parenthood? Reasons and social policy incentives. (2011, background): “Each approach has drawbacks (for a detailed discussion see Neyer and Andersson, 2008).”
- Family policies in developed countries: a ‘fertility-booster’ with side-effects (2011, background): “In particular, the premium on paid parental leave when a second child is born soon after the first, introduced in the mid-1980s in Sweden, seems to have reduced the spacing of births, a phenomenon that has persisted regardless of economic cycles (Andersson & Neyer, 2008 ).”