Stress that Doesn't Pay: The Commuting Paradox

By Alois Stutzer, Bruno S. Frey. Social Science Research Network, 2008

899 citations recorded by the source corpus.

People spend a lot of time commuting and often find it a burden. According to economics, the burden of commuting is chosen when compensated either on the labor or on the housing market so that individuals’ utility is equalized. However, in a direct test of this strong notion of equilibrium, we find that people with longer commuting time report systematically lower subjective well-being. Additional empirical analyses do not find institutional explanations of the empirical results that commuters systematically incur losses. We discuss several possibilities of an extended model of human behavior able to explain this ‘commuting paradox’.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/db3861fa82ce8247657847cb2441cdb057b0f4d0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. J. De Vos
  2. Paul Dolan
  3. Christopher M. Fleming
  4. C. Ambrey
  5. Robert Metcalfe
  6. Bruno S. Frey
  7. Alois Stutzer
  8. Olga Lorenz

In Social Psychology

  1. Paul Dolan
  2. Robert Metcalfe
  3. J. De Vos
  4. Alois Stutzer
  5. Bruno S. Frey
  6. Norbert Schwarz
  7. Daniel Kahneman
  8. Olga Lorenz

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. J. De Vos
  2. Daniel Kahneman
  3. Bruno S. Frey
  4. Paul Dolan
  5. Alois Stutzer
  6. A. Sousa-Poza
  7. Olga Lorenz
  8. Christopher M. Fleming

Citations in the corpus