Relating gravitational wave constraints from primordial nucleosynthesis, pulsar timing, laser interferometers, and the CMB: implications for the early universe

By Latham Boyle, A. Buonanno. 2007

167 citations recorded by the source corpus.

gw 0 (f1) and gw 0 (f2). Here r is the so-called “tensor-to-scalar ratio,” which is constrained by cosmic-microwave-background (CMB) experiments; and gw (f) is the energy spectrum of primordial gravitational-waves, which is constrained e.g. by pulsar-timing (PT) measurements, laser-interferometer (LI) experiments, and the standard Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN) bound. Differentiating the master equation yields a new expression for the tilt dln gw (f)/dlnf of the present-day gravitational-wave spectrum. The relationship between r and gw (f) depends sensitively on the uncertain physics of the early universe, and we show that this uncertainty may be encapsulated (in a model-independent way) by two quantities: ˆ w(f) and ˆ nt(f), where ˆ nt(f) is a certain logarithmic average over nt(k) (the primordial tensor spectral index); and ˆ w(f) is a certain logarithmic average over ˜ w(a) (the effective equation-of-state parameter in the early universe, after horizon re-entry). Here the effective equation-of-state parameter ˜ w(a) is a combination of the ordinary equation-of-state parameter w(a) and the bulk viscosity �(a). Thus, by comparing observational constraints on r and gw (f), one obtains (remarkably tight) constraints in the { ˆ w(f), ˆ nt(f)} plane. In particular, this is the best way to constrain (or detect) the presence of a “stiff” energy component (with w > 1/3) in the early universe, prior to BBN. (The discovery of such a component would be no more surprising than the discovery of a tiny cosmological constant at late times!) Finally, although most of our analysis does not assume inflation, we point out that if CMB experiments detect a non-zero value for r, then we will immediately obtain (as a free by-product) a new upper bound ˆ w < 0.55 on the logarithmically averaged effective equation-of-state parameter during

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/db2285722274af2f9865312173ef6edc24a5e963

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. G. Hobbs
  2. Andrey V. Kravtsov
  3. Volker Springel
  4. R. Manchester
  5. S. Allen
  6. L. Hernquist
  7. R. Shannon
  8. A. Sesana

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. S. Vagnozzi
  2. E. di Valentino
  3. G. Hobbs
  4. A. Sesana
  5. S. Allen
  6. David N. Spergel
  7. Mark Halpern
  8. A. Mantz

Citations in the corpus