A photosynthetic strategy for coping in a high‐light, low‐nutrient environment

By K. Mackey, Adina Paytan, Arthur R. Grossman, S. Bailey. 2008

101 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Phytoplankton in high‐light, low‐nutrient ocean environments are challenged with maintaining high photosynthetic efficiency and simultaneously preventing photodamage that results from low levels of electron acceptors downstream of photosystem II (PSII). Here, we identify a process in open ocean picophytoplankton that preserves PSII activity by diverting electrons from the photosystem I (PSI) complex‐mediated carbon assimilation to oxygen via a propyl gallate‐sensitive oxidase associated with the photosynthetic electron transport chain. This process stabilizes diel photochemical efficiency of PSII, despite midday photoinhibition, by maintaining oxidized PSII reaction centers. Although measurements of the maximum photochemical efficiency of PSII, Fv : Fm show midday photoinhibition, midday CO2 fixation is not depressed. Moreover, CO2 fixation saturates at low irradiances even though PSII electron flow is not saturated at irradiances of 1,985 mmol photons m−2 s−1. This disparity between PSII fluorescence and CO2 fixation is consistent with the activity of an oxidase that serves as a terminal electron acceptor, maintaining oxidized PSII reaction centers even when CO2 fixation has saturated and the total number of functional reaction centers decreases because of photoinhibition (reflected in lower midday Fv : Fm values). This phenomenon is less apparent in coastal phytoplankton populations, suggesting that it is a strategy particularly distinctive of phytoplankton in the oligotrophic ocean. Spatial variability in features of photosynthetic electron flow could explain biogeographical differences in productivity throughout the ocean and should be represented in models that use empirical photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence measurements from a limited number of ocean sites to estimate the productivity of the entire ocean.

Subfields: Ecology, Molecular Biology, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/daf56cf0638efe52fa0d9e4e0be0ef1b11e62a08

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

  1. R. Geider
  2. David John Suggett
  3. T. Kana
  4. Hugh L. MacIntyre

In Molecular Biology

  1. David John Suggett
  2. R. Geider
  3. Hugh L. MacIntyre
  4. T. Kana
  5. Mark E. Warner
  6. CM Moore
  7. S. Hennige
  8. Geir Johnsen

In Oceanography

  1. David John Suggett
  2. R. Geider
  3. Hugh L. MacIntyre
  4. T. Kana
  5. CM Moore
  6. Mark E. Warner
  7. S. Hennige
  8. T. Richardson

Citations in the corpus