Noise Levels of Multi-Rotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicles with Implications for Potential Underwater Impacts on Marine Mammals

By F. Christiansen, Laia Rojano-Doñate, Peter T. Madsen, L. Bejder. Frontiers in Marine Science, 2016

154 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Despite the rapid increase in the use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in marine mammal research, knowledge of the effects of UAVs on study animals is very limited. We recorded the in-air and in-water noise from two commonly used multi-rotor UAVs, the SwellPro Splashdrone and the DJI Inspire 1 Pro, to assess the potential for negative noise effects of UAV use. The Splashdrone and Inspire UAVs produced broad-band in-air source levels of 80 dB re 20µPa and 81 dB re 20µPa (rms), with fundamental frequencies centered at 60 Hz and 150 Hz. The noise of the UAVs coupled poorly into the water, and could only be quantified above background noise of the recording sites at 1m depth when flying at altitudes of 5 and 10m, resulting in broad-band received levels around 95 dB re µPa rms for the Splashdrone and around 101 dB re µPa rms for the Inspire. The third octave levels of the underwater UAV noise profiles are i) close to ambient noise levels in many shallow water habitats, ii) largely below the hearing thresholds at low frequencies of toothed whales, but iii) likely above the hearing thresholds of baleen whales and pinnipeds. So while UAV noise may be heard by some marine mammals underwater, it is implied that the underwater noise effect is small, even for animals close to the water surface. Our findings will be valuable for wildlife managers and regulators when issuing permits and setting guidelines for UAV operations. Further, our experimental setup can be used by others to evaluate noise effects of larger sized UAVs on marine mammals.

Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/daf10d9466ca8224e770cd00668a399d6ed6b0cb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental Biology

  1. Rob Harcourt
  2. F. Christiansen
  3. L. Bejder
  4. J. Durban
  5. David Lusseau

In Ecology

  1. F. Christiansen
  2. H. Fearnbach
  3. Rob Harcourt
  4. L. Bejder
  5. Ian D. Jonsen
  6. S. Dawson
  7. Martin Ostrowski
  8. J. Durban

In Oceanography

  1. Rob Harcourt
  2. F. Christiansen
  3. Ian D. Jonsen
  4. S. Dawson
  5. L. Bejder
  6. Martin Ostrowski
  7. J. Durban

Citations in the corpus