Large non-Gaussianity in multiple-field inflation
By G. Rigopoulos, E. Shellard, B. Tent. 2005
138 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We investigate non-Gaussianity in general multiple-field inflation using the formalism we developed in earlier papers. We use a perturbative expansion of the nonlinear equations to calculate the three-point correlator of the curvature perturbation analytically. We derive a general expression that involves only a time integral over background and linear perturbation quantities. We work out this expression explicitly for the two-field slow-roll case, and find that non-Gaussianity can be orders of magnitude larger than in the single-field case. In particular, the bispectrum divided by the square of the power spectrum can easily be of $\mathcal{O}(1--10)$, depending on the model. Our result also shows the explicit momentum dependence of the bispectrum. This conclusion of large non-Gaussianity is confirmed in a semianalytic investigation of a simple quadratic two-field model.
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/daee501834d6bc71d0ee580804c6e8d1f344113f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
In Nuclear and High Energy Physics
Citations in the corpus
- COrE (Cosmic Origins Explorer) A White Paper (2011, background): “, [100, 101, 102, 103]); models with non-canonical kinetic term [88] (as, e.”
- General CMB and primordial bispectrum estimation: Mode expansion, map making, and measures of F NL (2009, unknown): “This leaves a two-dimensional space on which it is most elegant to use the two independent variables α̃, β̃ [14, 19] α̃ = (k2 − k3)/k̃ , β̃ = (k̃ − k1)/k̃ , where k̃ = 12(k1 + k2 + k3) = const.”
- Primordial Non-Gaussianity and Bispectrum Measurements in the Cosmic Microwave Background and Large-Scale Structure (2010, background): “Indeed, it can prove convenient to characterize the bispectrum in terms of the following transverse parameters [6, 7]:”
- Algorithms for bispectra: Forecasting, optimal analysis, and simulation (2006, background): “…(Goldberg & Spergel 1999; Seljak & Zaldarriaga 1999; Spergel & Goldberg 1999; Cooray & Hu 2000; Hu 2000b; Verde & Spergel 2002) and early universe physics (Alishahiha et al. 2004; Rigopoulos et al. 2006, 2007; Chen et al. 2007a,b), which one might wish to study in a data set such as Planck.”
- Primordial non-Gaussianities from multiple-field inflation (2005, result): “The same conclusion was reached by Rigopoulos, Shellard & van Te nt [67].”
- Planck 2018 results. IX. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity (2019, background): “This, along with nonlinearities in the transfer mechanism itself, is a potential source of significant NG (Bartolo et al. 2002; Bernardeau & Uzan 2002; Vernizzi & Wands 2006; Rigopoulos et al. 2006, 2007; Lyth & Rodriguez 2005; Tzavara & van Tent 2011; Jung & van Tent 2017).”
- Planck 2015 results. XVII. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity (2015, unknown): “…of this transfer mechanism from isocurvature to adiabatic perturbations (Bartolo et al. 2002; Bernardeau & Uzan 2002; Vernizzi & Wands 2006; Rigopoulos et al. 2006, 2007; Lyth & Rodriguez 2005; Tzavara & van Tent 2011; for a review on NG from multiple-field inflation models, see Byrnes &…”
- Non-linear isocurvature perturbations and non-Gaussianities (2008, methodology): “The adiabatic curvature perturbations generated by this model have been computed in [11, 38, 39] and their non-Gaussianity in [40, 41, 42] (see also [43]).”