25 years at Knowledge-Based Systems: A bibliometric analysis

491 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Some bibliometric procedures for analyzing and evaluating research fields (2017, unknown): “It has been widely used to show and uncover the hidden key elements (documents, authors, institutions, topics, etc.) in diﬀerent research ﬁelds [12][13][14][18][37][43][48][49][54][64].”
International entrepreneurship: a bibliometric overview (2018, background): “Currently, both perspectives of bibliometrics have receive increased attention due to the strong development of computer technology and the internet (Cobo et al. 2015; Merigó et al. 2016), and are frequently studied in a combined way to validate and enrich the results of both.”
Conceptual structure and perspectives on entrepreneurship education research: A bibliometric review (2019, methodology): “In this phase, the themes are visualized by means of two different visualization instruments: strategic diagram and thematic network (Cobo et al., 2015).”
Ten Years of Sustainability (2009 to 2018): A Bibliometric Overview (2018, background): “[8] presented a bibliometric analysis of the journal.”