The Sizes of Compact Subsets of Hilbert Space and Continuity of Gaussian Processes
By R. Dudley. 1967
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Dacheng Tao
- Francis R. Bach
- Martin J. Wainwright
- Yoshua Bengio
- Michael I. Jordan
- Susan Athey
- Stefan Wager
- E.J. Candes
Citations in the corpus
- Additive models with trend filtering (2017, positive): “Then on E , Rn ( F ∩B2(t) ) ≤ Eσ [ sup g∈F∩Bn( √ 2t) 1 n ∣∣∣∣∣ n∑ i=1 σig(zi) ∣∣∣∣∣ ] ≤ c√ n ∫ √2t 0 √ logN(δ, ‖ · ‖n,F) dδ ≤ c √ Kρw/2√ n ∫ √2t 0 δ−w/2 dδ = c√ n t1−w/2, where in second line we used Dudley’s entropy integral [Dudley, 1967], and in the third line we used Assumption C3.”
- On the Error of Random Fourier Features (2015, methodology): “In order to apply the method of Dudley (1967), we must work around (cid:107) ω i (which appears in the covariance of the error process) being potentially unbounded.”
- Sliced Score Matching: A Scalable Approach to Density and Score Estimation (2019, neutral): “Then, Dudley’s entropy integral (Dudley, 1967) gives”
- Efficient Policy Learning (2017, positive): “Given this assumption define the complexity κ of the class Π in terms of a variant of the classical entropy integral of Dudley (1967):6 κ (Π) = ∫ 1 0 √ log (NH(ε2, Π)) dε.”
- Adaptive computation and machine learning (1998, background): “This problem can be avoided either by assuming the existence of an envelope, that is a single non-negative function with a finite expectation lying above the absolute value of the loss of every function in the hypothesis set [Dudley, 1984, Pollard, 1984, Dudley, 1987, Pollard, 1989, Haussler, 1992],”
- Long Range Dependence (2007, methodology): “The power-like behaviour of the incremental variance immediately allows one to check the metric entropy condition (see Dudley (1967)) or the Kolmogorov criterion (see e.”
- Data-dependent Sample Complexity of Deep Neural Networks via Lipschitz Augmentation (2019, methodology): “…functions in F i ’s: Textbook results (Bartlett & Mendelson, 2002) bound the generalization error by the Rademacher complexity (formally defined in Section A) of the family of losses L , which in turn is bounded by the covering number of L through Dudley’s entropy integral theorem (Dudley, 1967).”
- Confidence sets in sparse regression (2012, unknown): “By Dudley’s bound [see Dudley (1967) or more recent references such as van der Vaart and Wellner (1996), van de Geer (2000)], applied to the (conditional on X) Gaussian process θ ′ → εT X(θ − θ ′), and using ∫ c0 √log(c/x) dx = c ∫ 1 0 √ log(1/x) dx = cA, where A is the constant A = ∫ 10 √log(1/x)…”
- Policy Learning With Observational Data (2017, unknown): “cy value obtained by learning with doubly robust scores over the class of depth-2 trees. C Proofs C.1 Proof of Lemma2 Our proof of this result follows the outline of the classical chaining argument ofDudley (1967), whereby we construct a sequence of approximating sets of increasing precision for Ae ”
- Penalized Estimation in Additive Regression with High-Dimensional Data (2017, background): “|hε,f1in|/C1 >n −1/2ψ n(δ,F1)+δ p t/n ) ≤ exp(−t), where C1 = C1(D0,D1) >0 is a constant, depending only on (D0,D1). S2.2 Dudley and Talagrand inequalities The following inequalities are due to Dudley (1967) and Talagrand (1996). Lemma 13. For δ>0, let F1 be a functional class such that sup”
- The Convex Geometry of Linear Inverse Problems (2010, methodology): “Another tool for computing Gaussian widths is based on Dudley’s inequality [32, 49], which bounds the width of a set in terms of the covering number of the set at all scales.”
- Rademacher complexity and spin glasses: A link between the replica and statistical theories of learning (2019, background): “Indeed it can be shown ([11, 12, 13]) that the Rademacher complexity can be bounded by the VC dimension so that for some constant value C , Rm(F) ≤ C √ dVC(F) m .”
- Some new asymptotic theory for least squares series: Pointwise and uniform results (2012, unknown): “(η 1 = 1) = P(η 1 = −1) = 1/2) that are independent of the data, and denote η= (η 1,...,ηn). Also, let Eη[·] denote the expectation with respect to the distribution of η. Then by Dudley’s inequality (Dudley, 1967), Eη sup x∈X |α(x)′[Qb−1 −I]Gn[ηipiǫi]| . Zθ 0 q logN(T,k ·kn,2,ε)dε, where θ:= 2sup ”