Changing use of camera traps in mammalian field research: habitats, taxa and study types

By J. Mccallum. 2013

157 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dac5fd909b710d0101e25d2971ad476642323d0c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology

Citations in the corpus

The history of wildlife camera trapping as a survey tool in Australia (2015, background): “The global use of camera traps in wildlife research is growing exponentially (Rowcliffe and Carbone 2008; Diment 2010; McCallum 2012; Rovero et al. 2013) but the evolution of camera trapping in Australia has not been documented or analysed.”
"Which camera trap type and how many do I need?" A review of camera features and study designs for a range of wildlife research applications (2013, background): “Over the last 10 years, and in particular since 2006, there has been a substantial growth in the number of published camera trap studies (Rowcliffe and Carbone 2008; McCallum 2013; Fig.”
Estimating mammalian species richness and occupancy in tropical forest canopies with arboreal camera traps (2017, methodology): “Over the last decade, camera trapping has emerged as a preferred method for assessing terrestrial mammal populations, measuring species richness, occupancy, absolute density and activity patterns (McCallum 2013; O’Connell et al. 2011; Ahumada et al. 2011; Tobler et al. 2015) and their potential for ”
Limitations of recreational camera traps for wildlife management and conservation research: A practitioner’s perspective (2015, unknown): “…and fuelled at least by their apparent simplicity, the use of camera traps in wildlife management and conservation research has grown enormously over the last 20 years, with camera traps being deployed in a huge range of projects (Rowcliffe and Carbone 2008; McCallum 2013; Verma et al. 2015).”