A survey on routing protocols for wireless sensor networks

By Kemal Akkaya, Mohamed F. Younis. Ad hoc networks, 2005

2,311 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/daadcbb69eca1f5daa3f85dc463a160badedc609

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

1. Guihai Chen
2. Mao Ye
3. Chengfa Li
4. Jie Wu
5. Li-Minn Ang
6. Dilip Kumar
7. Michele Zorzi
8. J. Widmer

Citations in the corpus

• Wireless underground sensor networks: Research challenges (2006, neutral): “Current routing protocols for terrestrial WSNs [2] generally treat all devices equally with regard to selection for participation in a path from a source to a sink.”
• On the lifetime of wireless sensor networks (2009, background): “Many aspects concerning sensor networks have already been investigated [Akyildiz et al. 2002a], for example routing and data dissemination schemes [Akkaya and Younis 2005], self-organization issues [Dressler 2008], the ef.cient deployment of sensor nodes [Bai et al. 2006], and the interaction of…”
• The Internet of Things vision: Key features, applications and open issues (2014, background): “In the last ten years, WSNs have triggered intensive research activities which have produced a large body of literature addressing legacy networking such as MAC [53], routing [54] and transport protocols [55], connectivity and topology control [56–58].”
• In-network aggregation techniques for wireless sensor networks: a survey (2007, background): “Classic routing strategies [ 32 , 33] are usually based on a hierarchical organization of the nodes in the network.”
• Exploiting Virtual Coordinates for Improved Routing Performance in Sensor Networks (2011, background): “Among others,routinghasattractedmanyresearchprojects.Overthe last decades, a wide variety of routing protocols has been developed in the domain of sensor networks [ 9 ].”
• EEHC: Energy efficient heterogeneous clustered scheme for wireless sensor networks (2009, background): “It is not easy to find the route and reserve it, because the limited amount of energy and sudden change in the position of the nodes creates unpredictable changes [1,2].”
• WirelessHART: Applying Wireless Technology in Real-Time Industrial Process Control (2008, methodology): “Wireless sensor network has received extensive study recently [13, 18, 17, 21, 22, 12 ].”
• CRAHNs: Cognitive radio ad hoc networks (2009, neutral): “Classical ad hoc network routing algorithms can be classified on the basis of their: (i) support for maintaining multiple routes between a given source-destination pair [1], (ii) ability to guarantee specific QoS requirements [31], (iii) knowledge of the geographical location [59], (iv) scalability ”
• On maximum lifetime routing in Wireless Sensor Networks (2009, methodology): “A survey of state-of-theart routing algorithms is provided in [ 3 ].”
• An unequal cluster-based routing protocol in wireless sensor networks (2009, background): “Proposed protocols can be classified into data-centric, hierarchical, location-based, network flow and QoS-aware routing [ 6 ].”
• Classical and swarm intelligence based routing protocols for wireless sensor networks: A survey and comparison (2012, methodology): “…due to technological advancement has encouraged researchers in the past years to engage in an intensive research on addressing the potential of collaboration among sensors in data gathering, processing, coordination, and management of the sensed data flow to the sink (Akkaya and Younis, 2005).”
• A new evolutionary based routing protocol for clustered heterogeneous wireless sensor networks (2012, background): “Due to such differences, many new algorithms have been proosed for the routing problem inWSNs [6,7].”