What makes neighborhood different from home and city? Effects of place scale on place attachment ☆

By M. Lewicka. 2010

674 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Sociology and Political Science, Transportation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/daaa2ad0bc747e82c56e5ce8716ea3a99d5ce201

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

1. M. Lewicka
2. R. Gifford
3. L. Scannell
4. Ning Chen
5. Cristina Ruiz
6. B. Hernández
7. L. Dwyer
8. M. Rosenbaum

In Transportation

1. M. Lewicka
2. R. Gifford
3. L. Scannell
4. Cristina Ruiz
5. B. Hernández
6. Ning Chen
7. L. Dwyer
8. M. Rosenbaum

Citations in the corpus

• Place Attachment Enhances Psychological Need Satisfaction (2017, background): “For example, home can be a haven in the face of threats (Brown, Perkins, & Brown, 2003; Lewicka, 2010).”
• The role of place identity and place attachment in breaking environmental protection laws (2010, background): “…is an affective-emotional bond with residence places, whereas place identity is a cognitive mechanism, a component of self-concept and/or of personal identity in relation to the place one belongs to (Droseltis & Vignoles, 2010; Hernández, Hidalgo, SalazarLaplace, & Hess, 2007; Lewicka, 2010).”
• Testing the dimensionality of place attachment and its relationships with place satisfaction and pro-environmental behaviours: A structural equation modelling approach (2013, neutral): “These include sense of place (Jorgensen & Stedman, 2001), place attachment (Altman & Low, 1992; Guiliani & Feldman, 1993), community attachment (Perkins & Long, 2002), neighbourhood attachment (Brown, Perkins, & Brown, 2003; Lewicka, 2010), and connectedness to nature (Gosling & Williams, 2010) amon”
• Residents’ Place Satisfaction and Place Attachment on Destination Brand-Building Behaviors: Conceptual and Empirical Differentiation (2018, background): “Second, research on place attachment at the city level is very limited and deserves more attention according to the existing literature (Lewicka 2010).”
• Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? (2011, positive): “The unclear relationship between gating and place attachment was also found by Lewicka et al. (Lewicka, 2010; Zaborska & Lewicka, 2007) in studies carried out in several closed housing estates and their open counterparts in Poland, demonstrating that although gating seemed to contribute to a…”
• An expanded servicescape perspective (2011, background): “As consumers find that place patronage becomes cathartic, they are increasingly likely to develop a “sense of place” and to patronize the place on a daily or near-daily basis (Hay, 1998; Iso-Ahola and Park, 1996; Lewicka, 2010).”