NASA Data Evaluation: Chemical Kinetics and Photochemical Data for Use in Atmospheric Studies

By J. Burkholder, S. Sander, J. Abbatt, J. Barker, E. Fleming, R. Friedl, R. Huie, C. Jackman, C. Kolb, M. Kurylo and 2 more. 2014

722 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/daa29991a074dc2289283ef1ffe4228b75af49fd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Evaluation of CNRM Earth System Model, CNRM‐ESM2‐1: Role of Earth System Processes in Present‐Day and Future Climate (2019, background): “…current and the Michou et al. (2011) versions of the chemistry scheme consist of the following: (a) Kinetics and photolysis rates are now those of Sander et al. (2011), (b) monthly distributions of stratospheric sulfate aerosols are, on the basis of the study of Thomason et al. (2018), those of…”
The contribution of global aviation to anthropogenic climate forcing for 2000 to 2018 (2020, unknown): “The reaction rates and cross sections were updated to the evaluation of Sander et al. (2006) (see Skowron et al., 2009).”
Deriving brown carbon from multiwavelength absorption measurements: method and application to AERONET and Aethalometer observations (2016, background): “By assuming the oxidation rate of NO2 to be 1.05× 10−11 cm3 mol−1 s−1 at 01.00 atm and 300 K (Sander et al., 2011) and typical daytime OH concentration of 5× 105 mol cm−3 we estimate an e-folding time and half-life for the OA absorption to be 22 daytime hours and 14 daytime hours, respectively (or…”
Tropospheric chemistry in the integrated forecasting system of ECMWF (2014, background): “The oxidation of CO by the hydroxyl radical (OH) implicitly accounts for the formation and subsequent decomposition of the intermediate species HOCO as outlined in Sander et al. (2006).”
ABIOTIC O2 LEVELS ON PLANETS AROUND F, G, K, AND M STARS: POSSIBLE FALSE POSITIVES FOR LIFE? (2015, unknown): “…1 .0 × 1 0 − 1 0 e 2 1 1 N + O 2 → N O + O 1 .5 × 1 0 − 1 1 ·e − 3 6 0 0 T 1 6 2 1 2 N + O 3 → N O + O 2 1 .0 × 1 0 − 1 0 e 2 1 3 N + O H → N O + H 4 .7 × 1 0 − 1 1 1 5 2 1 4 N + N O → N 2 + O 2 .1 9 × 1 0 − 1 1 ·e 1 6 0 T 5 1 Notes— References: 1 Sander et al. (2011); 2 Baulch et al. (1992)…”
Solar Forcing for CMIP6 (v3.1) (2016, methodology): “MECCA (Module Efficiently Calculating the Chemistry of the Atmosphere) (R. Sander et al., 2011) provides the atmospheric chemistry model.”
The Framework for 0-D Atmospheric Modeling (F0AM) v3.1 (2016, unknown): “Incidentally, Wolfe already has some (rough) code to do this for MECCA and would be happy to share (cid:884) it is just not ready for inclusion in the model release.”
Attribution of the accelerating increase in atmospheric methane during 2010–2018 by inverse analysis of GOSAT observations (2020, background): “−1 s−1 is the temperaturedependent oxidation rate constant (Burkholder et al., 2015).”