The effects of kin and familiarity on interactions between fish

By Ashley J. W. Ward, Paul J. B. Hart. 2003

239 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/da979539c8bc5bbcaeee08c3e44123541609b39b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Effects of group size on the threat-sensitive response to varying concentrations of chemical alarm cues by juvenile convict cichlids (2006, background): “…Smith 1996; Chivers et al. 2000), learning (Kelley and Magurran 2003), familiarity and (or) relatedness among group members (Chivers et al. 1995; Ward and Hart 2003; Hoare et al. 2004), ontogeny (Chivers et al. 2001; Golub and Brown 2003), and availability of additional information (Brown and…”
Sex and social networking: the influence of male presence on social structure of female shark groups (2010, background): “Indeed, the benefits of associating with familiar conspecifics have been highlighted in a number of fish (Swaney et al. 2001; Ward and Hart 2003) and terrestrial animals (Moscovice and Snowdon 2006; Pinter-Wollman et al. 2009).”
Social recognition in sticklebacks: the role of direct experience and habitat cues (2005, background): “…identities of their tank mates may offer an alternative explanation for previous experiments on familiarity that frequently invoked learned identities as a possible explanation, provided that odour cues were accessible in the discrimination experiments (Krause et al. 2000; Ward and Hart 2003).”
Social structure and co-operative interactions in a wild population of guppies (Poecilia reticulata) (2006, background): “Associations between familiar individuals may be adaptive, for example, by reducing predation risk through co-ordinated anti-predator behaviour (see Griffiths 2003; Ward and Hart 2003 for reviews).”
Intraspecific food competition in fishes (2006, background): “Fish possess the ability to recognize related individuals (see Ward and Hart 2003) probably by MHC-based recognition (Olsen et al. 1998, 2002) yet information on relatedness seems to be used mainly in mate choice by many fishes (Landry et al. 2001; Aeschlimann et al. 2003; Milinski 2003).”
Network structure is related to social conflict in a cooperatively breeding fish (2013, background): “For example, in many species, individuals preferentially group with familiar individuals, because associating with known partners leads to lower aggression and higher foraging success (reviewed in: Griffiths 2003; Ward & Hart 2003).”