Size Does Matter: The Effects of Gender on Perceptions of Dating Violence
By S. Hamby, A. Jackson. 2010
108 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Gender Studies, Health, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/da8166bc76815a737cd25430a5afde0f2d822820
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Gender Studies
In Health
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Has Dating Become More Egalitarian? A 35 Year Review Using Sex Roles (2011, background): “Both men and women undergraduates rated dating violence in which the perpetrator was a man and the victim was a woman as more violent and frightening than any other gender dyad combination, including " female-on-male, " " male-on-male, " and " female-on-female " (Hamby and Jackson 2010).”
- On Defining Violence, and Why It Matters (2017, unknown): “As a result, in the absence of precise information on harm, people appear to use perpetrator gender to estimate the likely harm of an incident (Hamby & Jackson, 2010).”
- Teen Dating Violence: A Meta-Analytic Review of Prevalence Rates (2017, background): “Given that boys have a physical advantage over girls (Reeves & Orpinas, 2012), male-onfemale violence is more frightening and more serious than femaleon-male violence (Hamby & Jackson, 2010).”
- Lessons from Examining Same-Sex Intimate Partner Violence (2013, background): “This contributes to the erroneous conclusion that violence in relationships between two women is not serious while discouraging what may be an important analysis of what factors make injuries more likely to occur (Hamby and Jackson 2010).”
- Child Abuse and Neglect in the UK Today (2011, background): “Gender asymmetry, or moderate gender asymmetry, proposes a pattern that shows higher rates of abuse by males especially if sexual abuse is included, which is known to be very clearly gendered (Hamby and Jackson, 2011).”