Effect of steel fiber on the mechanical properties of oil palm shell lightweight concrete
By P. Shafigh, H. Mahmud, Mohd Zamin Jumaat. 2011
143 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Abstract This paper reports the results of a study conducted to investigate the effect of low volume content of steel fiber on the slump, density, compressive strength under different curing conditions, splitting tensile strength, flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of a grade 35 oil palm shell (OPS) lightweight concrete mixture. The results indicate that an increase in steel fiber decreased the workability and increased the density. All the mechanical properties except the modulus of elasticity (E) improved significantly. The 28 day compressive strength of steel fiber OPS lightweight concrete in continuously moist curing was in the range of 41–45 MPa. The splitting tensile/compressive and the flexural/compressive strength ratio for plain OPS concrete are comparable with artificial lightweight aggregate. The (E) value measured in this study was about 15.5 GPa on average for all mixes, which is higher than previous studies and is in the range of normal weight concrete. Steel fiber can be used as an alternative material to reduce the sensitivity of OPS concrete in poor curing environments.
Subfields: Building and Construction, Civil and Structural Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/da7a6b2e037611639119b148ed383ec6087566fb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Building and Construction
In Civil and Structural Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- Impact resistance of hybrid fibre-reinforced oil palm shell concrete (2014, background): “These values were found to be quite similar to the reported values for OPSC [12,32].”
- Utilization of oil palm kernel shell as lightweight aggregate in concrete - a review (2013, methodology): “…Liew (2006) 1792 – – Teo et al. (2007) – – 1960 Alengaram et al. (2008) 1850–1960 1639–1715 – Alengaram et al. (2008) 1888 – – Jumaat et al. (2009) – 1670 (foamed concrete) (varies) – Alengaram et al. (2010) 1880 – – Shafigh et al. (2011) – 1868–1937 – a Note: Values vary for different w/c ratios…”