Distributional impacts of taxing carbon in China: Results from the CEEPA model

149 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The impacts of carbon tax on energy intensity and economic growth – A dynamic evolution analysis on the case of China (2013, methodology): “Some researchers made innovations in model and method, such as difference-in-difference method [15], China Energy and Environmental Policy Analysis model [18], and SWITCH model [19].”
Climate policy modeling: An online SCI-E and SSCI based literature review (2015, background): “RICE Optimization [47] GREEN CGE [88] SGM CGE [89] CEEPA CGE [87] R&D-induced ETC-RICE Optimization [90] R&DICE Optimization [91] ENTICE Optimization [84] Learning-induced GET-LFL Optimization [92] FEEM-RICE Optimization [93] ICAM-3 Simulation [85] Direct price-induced IMAGE Simulation [94] ICAM-3 S”
The Economic impact of different carbon tax revenue recycling schemes in China: A model-based scenario analysis ☆ (2015, background): “Liang and Wei [17] adopted a recursive dynamic CGE model of China to explore the impact of a carbon tax on the urban–rural gap and living standard.”
Quantifying regional economic impacts of CO2 intensity targets in China (2012, background): “A range of other studies have focused on the impact of carbon mitigation and related energy policies in China, including a carbon tax (Cao, 2007; Liang and Wei, 2012), national absolute and intensity-based carbon limits (Dai et al.”