Analysis of genetic diversity for the management of conserved subdivided populations

By Armando Caballero, Miguel A. Toro. Conservation Genetics, 2002

392 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/da2df820b4e41648650607f4ce722c9e858578c5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

Citations in the corpus

A note on ENDOG: a computer program for analysing pedigree information. (2005, background): “…¼ D 1 À f ; and F IT ¼ ~ F À f 1 À f ; so that (1)F IT ) ¼ (1)F IS ) (1)F ST ), where ~ f , ~ F are respectively the mean coancestry and the inbreeding coefficient for the entire metapopulation, and f the average coancestry for the subpopulation [see equations (3) and (6) in Caballero & Toro 2002].”
Genetic management of small populations: A review (2009, background): “Across breed conservation decisions are often based on the between breed relationship matrix (Eding & Meuwissen, 2001 ; Caballero & Toro, 2002 ; Bennewitz & Meuwissen, 2005 ).”
Management of genetic diversity of subdivided populations in conservation programmes (2010, methodology): “…contribution of each subpopulation to a synthetic population or gene pool of maximum gene or allelic diversity can also be a way to prioritise subpopulations for conservation (Caballero and Toro 2002; Eding et al. 2002; Ollivier and Foulley 2005) and can be useful when germplasm stocks are created.”
Inbreeding and runs of homozygosity: A possible solution to an old problem (2014, background): “Several authors have examined other recently described methods for estimating inbreeding or the broader concept of relatedness between individuals (Browning and Browning, 2012; Caballero and Toro, 2002; Thompson, 2013).”
Molecular characterization of breeds and its use in conservation. (2009, background): “Several authors have criticised the application of the Weitzman approach in the context of within-species diversity (Caballero and Toro, 2002; Eding et al., 2002; see also Chevalet et al., 2006), mainly on the grounds that the method ignores within-population variability, which is a crucial componen”
Genomic measures of relationship and inbreeding (2007, methodology): “, 2005) and have been used to manage genetic diversity (Caballero and Toro, 2002) because of advantages over measures of genetic distance.”
Weitzman's Approach and Conservation of Breed Diversity: an Application to African Cattle Breeds (2003, methodology): “Caballero and Toro (2002) therefore recommend not using Weitzman’s (1992, 1993) method alone when it is important to consider or conserve within-population diversity.”
Sheep resources of Ethiopia : genetic diversity and breeding strategy (2008, methodology): “An approach based on marker-estimated average kinship between and within populations has recently been suggested (Eding and Meuwissen, 2001; Caballero and Toro, 2002).”